scholarly journals Microdiscectomy Under Local Anesthesia and Spinal Block in a Pregnant Female

Cureus ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denis Babici ◽  
Phillip M Johansen ◽  
Stu L Newman ◽  
Timothy E O'Connor ◽  
Timothy D Miller
Author(s):  
Z. M. Abdulatipova ◽  
M. A. Danilov ◽  
A. V. Leontiev ◽  
A. A. Khachaturian ◽  
G. G. Saakian ◽  
...  

Introduction. Assessment of proactive local anesthesia’s influence on how early postoperative period after hemorrhoidectomy undergoes.Materials and methods. The object of the study were 50 patients operated on for chronic combined hemorrhoids (stage 3). In the period from November 2018 to June 2019, they all had open hemorrhoidectomy made according to the standard method. All operations were performed under spinal anesthesia. Patients were divided into the main group (n = 26), operated on under proactive local anesthesia (PLA) with 0,75% ropivacaine solution and a comparison group (n = 24) that had not had PLA. The introduction was carried out immediately before hemorrhoidectomy after the spinal block was performed at 5 points. Pain was assessed with the help of questionnaires based on a visual analogue scale (VAS), 2, 4, 8, 24, 48 hours after surgery.Results. The level of postoperative pain in the main group was lower than in the comparison group (p<0.05) and did not exceed 1,78 points by VAS. In the comparison group, the level of postoperative pain after 8 and 24 hours on average exceeded 5 points by VAS. Patients of the main group did not need postoperative anesthesia in 68,5% (n = 17) cases, while in the comparison group 57% patients (n = 17), needed from 3 to 5 injections of NSAID to provide adequate pain relief.Conclusion. The use of a 0,75% ropivacaine solution for PLA reduces pain after hemorrhoidectomy, which does not lead to the need for additional analgesia in the early postoperative period and improves the patient’s quality of life.


1984 ◽  
Vol 48 (12) ◽  
pp. 653-658
Author(s):  
MM Walsh ◽  
R Hannebrink ◽  
B Heckman

2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (4S) ◽  
pp. 359-359
Author(s):  
Sompol Permpongkoso ◽  
Aaron Sulman ◽  
Stephen B. Solomon ◽  
GaryX Gong ◽  
Louis R. Kavoussi

Swiss Surgery ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 86-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lachat ◽  
Pfammatter ◽  
Bernard ◽  
Jaggy ◽  
Vogt ◽  
...  

Local anesthesia is a safe and less invasive anesthetic management for the endovascular approach to elective aortic aneurysm. We have successfully extended the indication of local anesthesia to a high-risk patient with leaking aneurysm and stable hemodynamics. Patient and methods: A 86 year old patient with renal insufficiency due to longstanding hypertension, coronary artery and chronic obstructive lung disease was transferred to our hospital with a leaking abdominal aortic aneurysm. Stable hemodynamics allowed to perform a fast CT scan, that confirmed the feasibility of endovascular repair. A bifurcated endograft (24mm x 12mm x 153mm) was implanted under local anesthesia. Results: The procedure was completed within 85 minutes without problems. The complete sealing of the aneurysm was confirmed by CT scan on the third postoperative day. Twenty months later, the patient is doing well and radiological control confirmed complete exclusion of the aneurysm. Discussion: The endoluminal treatment is a minimally invasive technique. It's feasibility can be rapidly assessed by CT scan. The transfemoral implantation can be performed under local anesthesia provided that hemodynamics are stable. This anesthetic management seems to be particularly advantageous for leaking abdominal aortic aneurysm since it doesn't change the hemodynamic situation in contrast to general anesthesia. Hemodynamic instability, abdominal distension or tenderness may indicate intraperitoneal rupture and conversion to open graft repair should be performed without delay.


2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 0737-0738
Author(s):  
Jason K. Fleming ◽  
Jay T. Ishida ◽  
Loren G. Yamamoto

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document