scholarly journals Driving Behavior Analysis of Commercial Vehicles(Buses) Using a Risky Driving Judgment Device

2012 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ju-Taek Oh
Keyword(s):  
Behavior Analysis ◽  
Driving Behavior ◽  
Commercial Vehicles ◽  
Risky Driving

scholarly journals Examining Risky Driving Behavior Among Older Drivers Using Self-Reported and Objective Data

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 465-465
Author(s):  
Jennifer Zakrajsek ◽  
Lisa Molnar ◽  
David Eby ◽  
David LeBlanc ◽  
Lidia Kostyniuk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motor Vehicle ◽  
Seat Belt ◽  
Driving Behavior ◽  
Video Data ◽  
Older Drivers ◽  
Driving Frequency ◽  
Middle Aged ◽  
Risky Driving ◽  
Driving Behaviors ◽  
Study Results

Abstract Motor vehicle crashes represent a significant public health problem. Efforts to improve driving safety are multifaceted, focusing on vehicles, roadways, and drivers with risky driving behaviors playing integral roles in each area. As part of a study to create guidelines for developing risky driving countermeasures, 480 drivers (118 young/18-25, 183 middle-aged/35-55, 179 older/65 and older) completed online surveys measuring driving history, risky driving (frequency of engaging in distracted [using cell phone, texting, eating/drinking, grooming, reaching/interacting] and reckless/aggressive [speeding, tailgating, failing to yield right-of-way, maneuvering unsafely, rolling stops] driving behaviors), and psychosocial characteristics. A cluster analysis using frequency of the risky behaviors and seat belt use identified five risky behavior-clusters: 1) rarely/never distracted-rarely/never reckless/aggressive (n=392); 2) sometimes distracted-rarely/never reckless/aggressive (n=33); 3) sometimes distracted-sometimes reckless/aggressive (n=40); 4) often/always distracted-often/always reckless/aggressive (n=11); 5) no pattern (n=4). Older drivers were more likely in the first/lowest cluster (93.8% of older versus 84.2% of middle-aged and 59.3% of young drivers; p<.0001). Fifteen older drivers participated in a follow-up study in which their vehicles were equipped with a data acquisition system that collected objective driving and video data of all trips for three weeks. Analysis of video data from 145 older driver trips indicated that older drivers engaged in at least one distracted behavior in 115 (79.3%) trips. While preliminary, this suggests considerably more frequent engagement in distracted driving than self-reported and that older drivers should not be excluded from consideration when developing risky driving behavior countermeasures. Full study results and implications will be presented.

scholarly journals Road Casualties and Changes in Risky Driving Behavior in France Between 2001 and 2004 Among Participants in the GAZEL Cohort

2009 ◽  
Vol 99 (7) ◽  
pp. 1247-1253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aymery Constant ◽  
Louis Rachid Salmi ◽  
Sylviane Lafont ◽  
Mireille Chiron ◽  
Emmanuel Lagarde
Keyword(s):  
Driving Behavior ◽  
Risky Driving

scholarly journals Intelligent Method for Identifying Driving Risk Based on V2V Multisource Big Data

Complexity ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinshuan Peng ◽  
Yiming Shao
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Traffic Accidents ◽  
Road Traffic ◽  
Time Window ◽  
Driving Behavior ◽  
Practical Significance ◽  
Accurate Identification ◽  
Risky Driving ◽  
Bayesian Filter ◽  
Identification Rate

Risky driving behavior is a major cause of traffic conflicts, which can develop into road traffic accidents, making the timely and accurate identification of such behavior essential to road safety. A platform was therefore established for analyzing the driving behavior of 20 professional drivers in field tests, in which overclose car following and lane departure were used as typical risky driving behaviors. Characterization parameters for identification were screened and used to determine threshold values and an appropriate time window for identification. A neural network-Bayesian filter identification model was established and data samples were selected to identify risky driving behavior and evaluate the identification efficiency of the model. The results obtained indicated a successful identification rate of 83.6% when the neural network model was solely used to identify risky driving behavior, but this could be increased to 92.46% once corrected by the Bayesian filter. This has important theoretical and practical significance in relation to evaluating the efficiency of existing driver assist systems, as well as the development of future intelligent driving systems.

Driving Behavior Analysis and Speed Limit Optimization with the Driving Simulator

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fan Wang ◽  
Fan Yang ◽  
Wei Yang ◽  
Huachun Tan ◽  
Bin Ran
Keyword(s):  
Behavior Analysis ◽  
Driving Simulator ◽  
Driving Behavior ◽  
Speed Limit
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document