scholarly journals A STUDY OF THE POSSIBLE DRUG-DRUG INTERACTIONS INVOLVING ORAL ANTIDIABETIC DRUGS IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE II DIABETES

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 141-144
Author(s):  
Sapna K Dongre ◽  
Anju Paulose ◽  
Nagesh G N ◽  
Amrutha Jacob ◽  
Suhag As-Hal ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 399-409
Author(s):  
M. Y Agrawal ◽  
Y. P Agrawal ◽  
A Pedhavi ◽  
G Hanmante ◽  
K. Sharma

Background: This survey was designed to analyze the current oral anti-diabetic drugs prescribed for non-complicated diabetic patients within Ratnagiri region on the basis of variation in prices of same drug available in different brands. Methods: The present survey has been conducted for a period of 4 months involving number of medical stores in Ratnagiri, Maharashtra, Doctors and Patients with randomly evaluating around 650 prescriptions. A standard questionnaire was prepared containing different questions; based on patient’s data (such as age, gender, disease history and medications), Doctor’s data (commonly prescribed drug, combination) and chemist data (available alternatives, cost and most selling brands). Results: Statistical analysis of patients data revels that there were 47.5% patients are in between the ages of 50 to 60 years and 92.5 % patient depends on oral antidiabetic drugs. Hypertension was the most common complication found among them (54%). Data from Doctor’s during survey suggested Metformin as mostly prescribed drug to patients having type- II Diabetes Mellitus as a single entity or in fixed dose combinations with Glimiperide or Gliclazide. An exhaustive survey over medical shops revealed that many brands of Metformin and Metformin in combination with Glimiperide or Gliclazide are available in market, but Glycomate (Metformin), Glycomate GP-1 (Metformin and Glimiperide) and Glizid-M (Metformin and Gliclazide) is mostly prescribed by Doctors and sold by Chemist though their cheapest alternatives are available in market. Cost analysis indicates that, wide variation in price of several brands (75-87 %) for oral anti-diabetics. Annual Turnover of these products in Indian domestic market indicates dominance of USV Pvt. Ltd. and Mankind Ltd. over other Pharmaceutical companies. Conclusions: This report will create better awareness among people for the availability of various brands of same anti-diabetic drug and also motivate our physicians to prescribe the economic products.


2012 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 592-601 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. van de Steeg ◽  
R. Greupink ◽  
M. Schreurs ◽  
I.H.G. Nooijen ◽  
K.C.M. Verhoeckx ◽  
...  

1979 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. 37-40

Drugs taken by diabetic patients for reasons other than the control of blood glucose may affect the response to insulin or oral antidiabetic drugs. Drugs may also interfere with tests for glucose or ketones in the urine or those estimating glucose in the blood. In Britain about a quarter of a million people take hypoglycaemic agents and many others are treated by diet alone, so it is clearly important to be aware of these special problems.


Pharmaceutics ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 680-705 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabine Klatt ◽  
Martin F. Fromm ◽  
Jörg König

2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 404-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Sasaki ◽  
Yutaka Seino ◽  
Atsushi Fukatsu ◽  
Michito Ubukata ◽  
Soichi Sakai ◽  
...  

Pituitary ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan L. Samson ◽  
Feng Gu ◽  
Ulla Feldt-Rasmussen ◽  
Shaoling Zhang ◽  
Yerong Yu ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Pasireotide is an effective treatment for acromegaly and Cushing’s disease, although treatment-emergent hyperglycemia can occur. The objective of this study was to assess incretin-based therapy versus insulin for managing pasireotide-associated hyperglycemia uncontrolled by metformin/other permitted oral antidiabetic drugs. Methods Multicenter, randomized, open-label, Phase IV study comprising a core phase (≤ 16-week pre-randomization period followed by 16-week randomized treatment period) and optional extension (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02060383). Adults with acromegaly (n = 190) or Cushing’s disease (n = 59) received long-acting (starting 40 mg IM/28 days) or subcutaneous pasireotide (starting 600 µg bid), respectively. Patients with increased fasting plasma glucose (≥ 126 mg/dL on three consecutive days) during the 16-week pre-randomization period despite metformin/other oral antidiabetic drugs were randomized 1:1 to open-label incretin-based therapy (sitagliptin followed by liraglutide) or insulin for another 16 weeks. The primary objective was to evaluate the difference in mean change in HbA1c from randomization to end of core phase between incretin-based therapy and insulin treatment arms. Results Eighty-one (32.5%) patients were randomized to incretin-based therapy (n = 38 received sitagliptin, n = 28 subsequently switched to liraglutide; n = 12 received insulin as rescue therapy) or insulin (n = 43). Adjusted mean change in HbA1c between treatment arms was – 0.28% (95% CI – 0.63, 0.08) in favor of incretin-based therapy. The most common AE other than hyperglycemia was diarrhea (incretin-based therapy, 28.9%; insulin, 30.2%). Forty-six (18.5%) patients were managed on metformin (n = 43)/other OAD (n = 3), 103 (41.4%) patients did not require any oral antidiabetic drugs and 19 patients (7.6%) were receiving insulin at baseline and were not randomized. Conclusion Many patients receiving pasireotide do not develop hyperglycemia requiring oral antidiabetic drugs. Metformin is an effective initial treatment, followed by incretin-based therapy if needed. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02060383.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document