scholarly journals Delayed Small Bowel Obstruction Due to Intra-Abdominal Drain: Case Report and Literature Review

2018 ◽  
Vol 103 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 149-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mei Yang ◽  
Biniam Kidane ◽  
Elizabeth Saettler

This is a unique case of a closed-loop bowel obstruction secondary to intra-abdominal drain insertion to illustrate a new complication of drain usage. A 47-year-old patient presents with bowel distention and obstruction. Laparotomy revealed obstructed small bowel looped around a fibrotic tract tracing back to a drain insertion point. This is a case report where a patient suffers rare long-term complications from routine drain insertion. Although beneficial in treating infection and abscess formation after anastomotic leaks, drain insertion as a prophylactic measure has not been proven to be beneficial. Surgeons who routinely use intra-abdominal drains should be aware of the complications of drain insertion and use with caution. Although not extensively documented, serious complications from drain insertion do occur. There is no role for prophylactic drain insertion in colonic anastomoses procedures.

2022 ◽  
pp. 103256
Author(s):  
Bibek Man Shrestha ◽  
Suraj Shrestha ◽  
Shiva Aryal ◽  
Susan Pradhan ◽  
Romi Dahal ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 145749692098276
Author(s):  
M. Podda ◽  
M. Khan ◽  
S. Di Saverio

Background and Aims: Approximately 75% of patients admitted with small bowel obstruction have intra-abdominal adhesions as their cause (adhesive small bowel obstruction). Up to 70% of adhesive small bowel obstruction cases, in the absence of strangulation and bowel ischemia, can be successfully treated with conservative management. However, emerging evidence shows that surgery performed early during the first episode of adhesive small bowel obstruction is highly effective. The objective of this narrative review is to summarize the current evidence on adhesive small bowel obstruction management strategies. Materials and Methods: A review of the literature published over the last 20 years was performed to assess Who, hoW, Why, When, What, and Where diagnose and operate on patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction. Results: Adequate patient selection through physical examination and computed tomography is the key factor of the entire management strategy, as failure to detect patients with strangulated adhesive small bowel obstruction and bowel ischemia is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The indication for surgical exploration is usually defined as a failure to pass contrast into the ascending colon within 8–24 h. However, operative management with early adhesiolysis, defined as operative intervention on either the calendar day of admission or the calendar day after admission, has recently shown to be associated with an overall long-term survival benefit compared to conservative management. Regarding the surgical technique, laparoscopy should be used only in selected patients with an anticipated single obstructing band, and there should be a low threshold for conversion to an open procedure in cases of high risk of bowel injuries. Conclusion: Although most adhesive small bowel obstruction patients without suspicion of bowel strangulation or gangrene are currently managed nonoperatively, the long-term outcomes following this approach need to be analyzed in a more exhaustive way, as surgery performed early during the first episode of adhesive small bowel obstruction has shown to be highly effective, with a lower rate of recurrence.


BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Song Liu ◽  
Qiongyuan Hu ◽  
Lihua Shao ◽  
Xiaofeng Lu ◽  
Xiaofei Shen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is common and usually requires surgical intervention. Intestinal plication is a traditional but critical strategy for SBO in certain scenarios. This study is to compare the short-term and long-term outcome between internal and external plications in the management of SBO. Methods All patients receiving intestinal plication in our hospital were retrospectively collected. Short-term outcome including postoperative complications, reoperation, postoperative ICU stay, starting day of liquid diet and postoperative hospitalization, as well as long-term outcome including recurrence of obstruction, readmission, reoperation and death were compared between groups. Gut function at annual follow-up visits was evaluated as well. Results Nine internal and 11 external candidates were recruited into each group. The major causes of plication were adhesive obstruction, abdominal cocoon, volvulus and intussusception. Lower incidence of postoperative complication (p = 0.043) and shorter postoperative hospitalization (p = 0.049) was observed in internal group. One patient receiving external plication died from anastomosis leakage. During the 5-year follow-up period, the readmission rate was low in both groups (22.2 % vs. 9.1 %), and none of patients required reoperation or deceased. None of patients exhibited gut dysfunction, and all patients restored normal gut function after 4 years. Patients in external group demonstrated accelerated recovery of gut function after surgery. Conclusions This study compares short-term and long-term outcome of patients receiving internal or external intestinal plication. We suggest a conservative attitude toward external plication strategy. Surgical indication for intestinal plication is critical and awaits future investigations.


2005 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 138-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heong-Ieng Wong ◽  
Chiao-Yun Chen ◽  
Gin-Chung Liu

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 ◽  
pp. 20-22
Author(s):  
Nafeesah Fatimah ◽  
Abubaker Shafiq Ahmed ◽  
Muhammad Umar Warraich ◽  
Usman Ismat Butt ◽  
Qamar Ashfaq Ahmad ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document