scholarly journals Comparison of clinical outcomes in hepatitis B virus positive and negative renal transplant recipients

Author(s):  
Vural Taner Yilmaz ◽  
Ramazan Cetinkaya ◽  
Halide Akbas ◽  
Sebahat Ozdem ◽  
Burak Veli Ulger ◽  
...  

Abstract Aim: Our aim was to compare the short and long term clinical outcomes of HbsAg(+) renal transplant recipients with HbsAg(-) recipients. Patients and Methods: Two hundered and four patients who underwent renal transplantation in our center between 2001 and 2014 were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups. Group 1: HbsAg(-) group (n=136) and Group 2: HbsAg(+) group (n=68). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of lymphocyte cross matches, numbers of mismatches, immunosuppressive treatment protocols and induction treatments. In HbsAg(+) group, 51 patients were HBV DNA(+), 64 patients were HbeAg(-) and 4 patients were HbeAg(+). Fifty-seven (83.8%) patients were treated with Lamivudine, 4 (5.9%) patients with Entecavir and 7 (10.3%) patients with Tenofovir for Hepatitis B infection. Graft and patient survival rates, graft functions, acute hepatitis rates, acute rejection rates and other clinical outcomes of the groups were compared. Results: Demographic data and immuologic risk profiles of the groups were similar. Acute rejection rates, graft survival rates and patient survival rates were similar. Acute hepatitis rates, glomerular filtration rates on the last controls and delayed graft function rates were higher in Group 2, while chronic allograft disfunction and new onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation (NODAT) rates were similar between the groups. Conclusion: Our study revealed that, graft and patient survival and acute rejection rates were similar between HbsAg(+) and HbsAg(-) recipients, while acute hepatitis rate was higher in HbsAg(+) recipients.

2008 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 120-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Karakayali ◽  
S. Pehlivan ◽  
Y. Ekici ◽  
S. Sevmis ◽  
T. Colak ◽  
...  

Graft ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
pp. 455-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafik El-Sabrout ◽  
Veronica Delaney ◽  
Fauzia Butt ◽  
Mohamad Qadir ◽  
Pat Hanson ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Guadalup García-Pino ◽  
Enrique Luna ◽  
Sonia Mota-Zamorano ◽  
Luz María González ◽  
María Ángeles Tormo ◽  
...  

IntroductionLeptin is a pro-inflammatory adipocytokine implicated in cardiovascular disease, insulin resistance, obesity and chronic kidney disease.Material and methodsIn a cohort of 236 renal transplant recipients, we aimed to determine whether circulating leptin concentrations and/or three polymorphisms in the leptin receptor (LEPR) gene, namely rs1137100, rs1137101 and rs1805094, were related to clinical outcomes in renal transplantation. Plasma leptin concentrations were measured by ELISA. Genetic variants were determined by conventional real-time PCR assays and statistical associations with clinical outcomes were obtained by logistic regression modelling.ResultsPatients with elevated leptin levels were at higher risk of acute rejection [OR=1.03 (1.01–1.05), p=0.03] and displayed worse renal clearance (p=0.001) than patients with lower levels. Leptin levels were not significantly affected by any of the three LEPR SNPs. The rs1137101 G variant showed an inverse association with the risk of delayed graft function (DGF) [OR=0.42 (0.22-0.81), p=0.009], whilst the homozygous rs1805094 CC genotype was associated with increased risk of acute rejection [OR=11.38 (2.15-60.16), p=0.004]. A statistically significant association was also observed between the rs1137100 GG genotype and better renal function [mean difference vs. AA/AG =20.20 (4.91-35.49) ml/min, p=0.010].ConclusionsOur results show that both leptin plasma concentrations and polymorphisms in the LEPR gene may affect clinical outcomes in renal transplant recipients, suggesting that the determination of these parameters could be useful in predicting post-transplant adverse events.


2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 381-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qinxia Xu ◽  
Xiaoyan Qiu ◽  
Zheng Jiao ◽  
Ming Zhang ◽  
Jianping Chen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anupma Kaul ◽  
Thomas Mathews

Abstract Background and Aims Acute graft pyelonephritis(AGPN) is thought to affect graft and patient survival among renal transplant recipients. Our objective was to compare these outcomes in those having early AGPN(<6 months from transplant) versus those having late AGPN(>6months from transplant) Method This retrospective study analyzed 150 patients who had AGPN over a period of 8 years from 2005 to 2013. They were divided into early AGPN group and late AGPN group. Their baseline characteristics were compared. Predictors of graft loss and mortality were compared using logistic regression analysis. Graft survival and patient survival were analyzed using Kaplan-Meyer survival plots Results A total of 150 patients with AGPN were analyzed. Of these 55.3% (n=83) had early AGPN and 44.7% (n=67) had late AGPN. These two groups were comparable regarding baseline characteristics and immunosuppression. In early AGPN group, 13.3% (n=11) patients had CMV disease during follow up compared to 3% (n=2) in late AGPN group(p<0.05). In the early AGPN group, 26.5% (n=22) had prolonged Foley’s catheterization (>5days) following transplant surgery compared to 7.5% (n=5) in late AGPN group (p<0.05). In the early AGPN group, 38.6% (n=32) had prolonged DJ stent in-situ (>2weeks) following transplant surgery compared to 19.4% (n=13) in the late AGPN group (p<0.05). Recurrent GPN was more common in the late AGPN group than the early AGPN group - 35.8% (n=24) versus 18.1% (n=15). Predictors for graft loss were assessed in patients with AGPN and the presence of renal abscess was predictive of graft loss in univariate analysis (HR-6.129, 95% CI 1.776–21.154, p-0.004). There were no significant predictors of mortality in univariate analysis. Kaplan Meier survival analysis showed decreased death censored graft survival in the early AGPN group (p-0.035). There was no Conclusion Occurrence of early AGPN had a significant impact on long term graft survival in renal transplant recipients with no significant effect on patient survival. This study underlines the paramount importance of the prevention of UTIs in renal transplant recipients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document