acute allograft rejection
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

250
(FIVE YEARS 23)

H-INDEX

33
(FIVE YEARS 3)

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (17) ◽  
pp. 3779
Author(s):  
Sabina Herrera ◽  
Javier Bernal-Maurandi ◽  
Frederic Cofan ◽  
Pedro Ventura ◽  
Maria Angeles Marcos ◽  
...  

We aimed to ascertain the interaction and effects of combined reactivations of BK virus and cytomegalovirus on kidney graft function. All consecutive kidney transplant recipients (KTR) between 2003 and 2016 were included. Of 1976 patients who received a kidney transplant, 23 (1.2%) presented BKV-associated nephropathy (BKVAN). Factors independently associated with BKVAN were diabetes mellitus (odds ratios (OR) 3.895%, confidence intervals (CI) (1.4–10.5)), acute allograft rejection (OR 2.8 95%, CI (1.1–7.6)) and nephrostomy requirement (OR 4.195%, CI (1.3–13)). Cytomegalovirus infection was diagnosed in 19% of KTR patients. Recipients with BKVAN presented more frequently with cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection compared to patients without BKVAN (39% vs. 19%, p = 0.02). Acute allograft rejection (OR 2.95%, CI (1.4–2.4)) and nephrostomy requirement (OR 2.95%, CI (1.2–3)) were independently associated with CMV infection. Sixteen patients (69%) with BKVAN had graft dysfunction at one-year post-transplant and eight of them (35%) lost their graft. Patients presenting with BKVAN and graft loss presented more frequently a cytomegalovirus infection (OR 2.295%, CI (1.3–4.3)). In conclusion, we found a relation between CMV infection and graft loss in patients presenting BKVAN, suggesting that patients with CMV reactivation should be actively screened for BKV.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolyn P. Smullin ◽  
Robert S. Venick ◽  
Elizabeth A. Marcus ◽  
Bita V. Naini ◽  
Douglas G. Farmer

2021 ◽  
Vol 53 ◽  
pp. S46-S47
Author(s):  
A. Liguori ◽  
M. Pascale ◽  
M. Biolato ◽  
G. Marrone ◽  
L. Miele ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 216 (8) ◽  
pp. 153021
Author(s):  
Wei Gu ◽  
Ruru Ge ◽  
Fangming Zhu ◽  
Dan Li ◽  
Rui Liang ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (12) ◽  
pp. 3462-3476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire Tinel ◽  
Arnaud Devresse ◽  
Agathe Vermorel ◽  
Virginia Sauvaget ◽  
David Marx ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 852-859
Author(s):  
Neeta Sethi ◽  
Ashish Doshi ◽  
Tina Doshi ◽  
Russell Cross ◽  
Ileen Cronin ◽  
...  

AbstractBackground:Monitoring for acute allograft rejection improves outcomes after cardiac transplantation. Endomyocardial biopsy is the gold standard test defining rejection, but carries risk and has limitations. Cardiac magnetic resonance T2 mapping may be able to predict rejection in adults, but has not been studied in children. Our aim was to evaluate T2 mapping in identifying paediatric cardiac transplant patients with acute rejection.Methods:Eleven paediatric transplant patients presenting 18 times were prospectively enrolled for non-contrast cardiac magnetic resonance at 1.5 T followed by endomyocardial biopsy. Imaging included volumetry, flow, and T2 mapping. Regions of interest were manually selected on the T2 maps using the middle-third technique in the left ventricular septal and lateral wall in a short-axis and four-chamber slice. Mean and maximum T2 values were compared with Student’s t-tests analysis.Results:Five cases of acute rejection were identified in three patients, including two cases of grade 2R on biopsy and three cases of negative biopsy treated for clinical symptoms attributed to rejection (new arrhythmia, decreased exercise capacity). A monotonic trend between increasing T2 values and higher biopsy grades was observed: grade 0R T2 53.4 ± 3 ms, grade 1R T2 54.5 ms ± 3 ms, grade 2R T2 61.3 ± 1 ms. The five rejection cases had significantly higher mean T2 values compared to cases without rejection (58.3 ± 4 ms versus 53 ± 2 ms, p = 0.001).Conclusions:Cardiac magnetic resonance with quantitative T2 mapping may offer a non-invasive method for screening paediatric cardiac transplant patients for acute allograft rejection. More data are needed to understand the relationship between T2 and rejection in children.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document