A phenomenological study on barriers of adherence to medical advice among type 2 diabetic patients

Background More than three decades of research and study for overcoming the problem of “non-acceptance/non-compliance” of patients has neither resolved nor reduced the severity of this problem. This phenomenological study aimed to identify barriers of adherence to medical advice among type 2 diabetic patients. Methods This study was a qualitative research using phenomenology approach, and the data were analyzed using content analysis approach. Participants were 69 type 2 diabetic patients covered by the diabetes unit of West and East Community Health Centers of Ahvaz, Iran. The views and attitudes of patients about the barriers of adherence to medical advice were elicited by conducting 20–45 min sessions of semi-structured interviews. Data analysis was performed following Colaizzi’s seven-step method. Results Barriers of adherence to medical advice were classified into systemic and individual barriers. Individual barriers included 11 codes and 5 categories, and systemic barriers contained within 5 codes and 3 categories. Physiologic and physical factors, financial problems, occupational factors, attitudinal problems and lack of knowledge, and social and family problems were identified as individual barriers. Systemic barriers included inadequate publicizing and limited notification, inadequate equipment and facilities, and poor inter-sectional coordination. Conclusions Generally, problems stated by diabetic patients at the individual level can partly be solved by training patients and the people around them. However, as for the systemic problems, it seems that solving the barriers of adherence to medical advice requires coordination with other organizations as well as intersection coordination. Overall, these problems require not only comprehensive health service efforts, but also the support of policymakers to resolve barriers at infrastructure level.

Finding Our Way to the Island: Critical Reflections from Two Emerging Pacific Legal Academics in Aotearoa

This article offers critical reflections regarding legal scholarship on Pacific peoples in Aotearoa from two Pacific early career academics in the legal academy. It explores why very little legal scholarship focusing on the issues facing Pacific peoples in Aotearoa exists by examining and illustrating the systemic barriers that prevent Pacific legal academics from producing such scholarship. It then examines the detrimental impacts this lack of legal scholarship on Pacific peoples in Aotearoa has on both Pacific law students and Pacific communities in Aotearoa. Lastly, it imagines a Pacific jurisprudence for Pacific peoples in Aotearoa located within Pacific communities, committed to fulfilling the obligations that Pacific peoples have to Māori as Tangata Whenua of Aotearoa.

Reflections on systemic barriers for ethnic minorities in accessing community-based forensic services for people with intellectual disabilities and autism

Purpose Community-based forensic support services (CBFSSs) were commissioned nationally by National Health Service (NHS) England in 2017 in response to “Building the Right Support” (NHS England, 2015). CBFSSs provide multidisciplinary support to adults with intellectual disabilities and/or autism who are in (or at risk of) contact with the criminal justice system and those transitioning from inpatient secure care. This paper aims to highlight potential systemic barriers to accessing community forensic services for people from an ethnic minority background. in one CBFSSs in Northern England. Design/methodology/approach This paper provides preliminary reflections on potential systemic barriers within the criminal justice system and health-care services that have implications for service users from ethnic minority backgrounds accessing CBFSSs. Findings There is a paucity of data, policy and literature that focuses on people with intellectual disabilities and autism with forensic needs from ethnic minority backgrounds. This lack of data obstructs further reforms to meet the needs of this population. Originality/value CBFSSs are commissioned across England. While some regional variation is to be expected, services should be aware of the systemic barriers people from ethnic minority backgrounds within their region face. These barriers should be considered and addressed when evaluating service efficacy and delivery. Recommendations are made to review and address issues of under-representation of ethnic minorities within CBFSSs.

856. Barriers to PrEP Implementation among Patient-Facing Staff in Three Urban Clinics

Background PrEP implementation has lagged in the US. The role of multidisciplinary staff in PrEP rollout has been neglected. We sought to identify barriers to PrEP implementation among 3 urban federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) in Connecticut that provide HIV and PrEP services in order to inform development of staff training. Methods A link to an anonymous survey was emailed to patient-facing staff members or posted at the end of staff trainings October 2020-April 2021. The survey requested demographics, duration of employment, and using 4 and 5 point Likert scales, ascertained knowledge and beliefs toward PrEP based on established scales, and perceived individual and systemic barriers to PrEP uptake. Results Among 101 respondents, 40% were 36-54yo, 22% were male, 68% were non-prescribing clinicians, and median duration of employment was 6 years (IQR 2-14). Among 32 (31%) prescribers (physicians, PAs, APRNs), 97% felt comfortable discussing sexual risk with patients, though 15% were not familiar with PrEP efficacy and safety data, 28% responded that PrEP use would encourage risky behaviors, 34% were concerned about side effects, 53% responded that educational and behavioral interventions should be attempted prior to prescribing PrEP, and 59% identified lack of provider training as a barrier. Among 69 (68%) non-prescribers, barriers to PrEP uptake included: patients don’t ask for PrEP (43%), lack of insurance (47%), lack of clinic guidelines/protocol (42%), and staff time for counseling (31%). Conclusion Prescribers and non-prescribers identified distinct individual and systemic barriers to PrEP uptake at FQHCs. Among prescribers, uncertainty regarding indications for and safety of PrEP exist, which will be addressed with targeted training. Non-prescribers identified the need for patient outreach, financial assistance, and counseling as the top priorities. The input of clinic multidisciplinary team members is essential to addressing barriers to PrEP implementation. Disclosures Sheela Shenoi, MD, MPH, Merck (Other Financial or Material Support, SS’s spouse worked for Merck pharmaceuticals 1997-2007 and retains company stock in his retirement account. There is no conflict of interest, but it is included in the interest of full disclosure.)