Bareback sex, PrEP, National AIDS Trust v NHS England and the reality of gay sex

In this article, I use empirical data regarding the prevalence of bareback sex and the HIV treatment PrEP to argue that the High Court and Court of Appeal of England and Wales in National AIDS Trust v NHS England, have reflected the reality of gay sex. I argue that this case represents a shift in legal approaches to preventative sexual health methods that recognises the reality of gay male sexuality regarding the allocation of funding responsibility for the pre-exposure prophylaxis. I argue that the treatment, which prevents transmission of HIV, is a significant feature of gay and bisexual men’s sexuality and has the potential to transform narratives surrounding personal agency and individual responsibility. This article uses doctrinal, theoretical and empirical analysis, to the conclusion that the case represents a significant step in the recognition of the reality of gay sex.

Reporting pre-exposure prophylaxis use in Craigslist personal advertisements among men seeking sex with men in the United States

This study describes the self-reported use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in the personal advertisements of men seeking sex with men in the United States on the online classified advertisement site, Craigslist. Overall self-reported PrEP use was low (0.20%; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.18–0.22). However, PrEP use in personal ads was described in conjunction with seeking sexual risk behaviours including ‘bareback’ sex (22.7%; 95% CI = 17.7–27.7%) and sex with substance use (26.8%; 95% CI = 21.5–32.1%). Only 4.0% of personal ads sought safe sex (3.3%; 95% CI = 1.2–5.4%) or required condoms (0.7%; 95% CI = –0.3–1.7%). Our findings underscore the need for increased public PrEP awareness, particularly among men seeking sex with men, as well as the importance of healthcare providers emphasising sexually transmissible infection prevention behaviours (i.e. condom use) used in conjunction with PrEP.