The final chapter, chapter 7, weaves together the findings from both the cross-national, time-serial statistical analyses and the in-depth case studies to offer overarching arguments for why women’s representation advanced on high courts around the world. Despite differences in socioeconomic and legal contexts, a common denominator emerges: high courts are gendered. Taken together, both the cross-national and cross-temporal evidence shows that women’s appointments to the peak bench is not automatic, and that both domestic and international factors are influential. In general, despite relatively full pipelines, gendered institutions in the selection process have limited women’s advancement. In different ways, changing global norms have raised the profile of women’s appointments, placing pressure on those with the power to transform the bench, although with varying degrees of success. A chain of favorable influences emerge: new norms of gender equality encourage reimagining the composition of courts; advocacy organizations challenge the status quo; and windows of opportunity enable change. For women to make significant and sustainable strides, it is necessary to go beyond equal treatment and access to the same opportunities. Instead, what is needed is an equity-minded approach: a fundamental transformation of the processes that were built around the traditional all-men norm. The chapter offers a multi-pronged set of approaches for diversifying the judiciary. Reimagining high courts is not only about gender parity; it means building inclusive judiciaries that reflect the full range of lived experiences in society.