colonic diverticulum
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

128
(FIVE YEARS 31)

H-INDEX

13
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Andrea Parra Corral ◽  
Jesus R. Diaz, MD

2022 ◽  
Vol 10 (01) ◽  
pp. E50-E55
Author(s):  
Akira Mizuki ◽  
Masayuki Tatemichi ◽  
Atsushi Nakazawa ◽  
Nobuhiro Tsukada ◽  
Hiroshi Nagata ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and study aims When patients present with acute colonic diverticulum bleeding (CDB), a colonoscopy is performed to identify stigmata of recent hemorrhage (SRH), but valuable time can be lost in bowel preparation. This study retrospectively examined groups of patients who either had a standard pre-colonoscopy regimen or no preparation. Patients and methods This study compared data from 433 patients who either followed a lengthy regimen of bowel preparation (prepared group, 266 patients) or had no preparation (unprepared group, 60 patients). We compared the association between time (hours) between admission before starting a colonoscopy (TMS) and identification of SRH using a chi-square test. Results In 48 of 60 cases (80.0 %) in the unprepared group, a total colonoscopy was performed and the time to identify SRH was decreased. The respective rates of SRH identification in the unprepared and prepared groups were 55.2 % (16/29) vs. 46.7 % (7/15) if the TMS was < 3 hours; 47.1 % (8/7) vs. 36.8 % (35/95) in 3 to 12 hours; 0 % (0/3) vs. 22.0% (13/59) in 12 to 18 hours; and 21.8 % (3/11) vs. 20.6% (42/204) in > 18 hours. There were no significant differences between the two groups. However, the SRH identification rates before and after 12 hours were 42.3 % (66/156) and 20.9 % (58/277) (P < 0.001). Conclusions Our data suggest that the bowel preparation method before colonoscopy is an independent variable predicting success in identifying SRH among patients with CDB. Decreasing the time before colonoscopy to no more than 12 hours after admission played an important role in identifying SRH.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorenzo VASSALLO ◽  
Mirella FASCIANO ◽  
Federica GROPPO MARCHISIO ◽  
Roberto BORSA ◽  
Pietro COPPOLA ◽  
...  

VideoGIE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taro Iwatsubo ◽  
Toshihisa Takeuchi ◽  
Shoko Honda ◽  
Masahiro Sakaguchi ◽  
Kazuhide Higuchi

Author(s):  
Francesco Cocomazzi ◽  
Sonia Carparelli ◽  
Rossella Cubisino ◽  
Arcangela Patrizia Giuliani ◽  
Fabrizio Bossa ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (02) ◽  
pp. 121-126
Author(s):  
Elizabeth H. Wood ◽  
Michael M. Sigman ◽  
Dana M. Hayden

AbstractDiverticular disease affects a large percentage of the US population, affecting over 30% among those older than 45 years old. It is responsible for ∼300,000 hospitalizations per year in the United States and can lead to serious complications such as hemorrhage, obstruction, abscess, fistulae, or bowel perforation.2 It is an extremely common reason for emergency room and outpatient visits and evaluations by general and colorectal surgeons. In the US, patients usually present with sigmoid diverticulitis in the setting of a normal immune system so surgeons will follow well-established practice guidelines for treatment. However, there may be special circumstances in which the management of diverticulitis is not as straightforward. In this article, we will address patients who present with multifocal disease, giant colonic diverticulum, right-sided diverticulitis, and diverticulitis in the setting of immunosuppression and hopefully provide guidance for treatment in these special circumstances.


Endoscopy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Lambin ◽  
Jérémie Jacques ◽  
Jérôme Rivory ◽  
Florian Rostain ◽  
Timothée Wallenhorst ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document