hymenoptera venom allergy
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

153
(FIVE YEARS 39)

H-INDEX

25
(FIVE YEARS 3)

Allergy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bilò Maria Beatrice ◽  
Alice Corsi ◽  
Matteo Martini ◽  
Maria Giovanna Danieli ◽  
Sonila Alia ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 350-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayse Engin ◽  
Fatma B. Oktelik ◽  
Aslı Gelincik ◽  
Aytul Sin ◽  
Betul A. Sin ◽  
...  

Background: Hymenoptera venom allergy is an immunoglobulin (Ig) E mediated hypersensitivity reaction to Hymenoptera venoms. Obvious identification of the culprit insect that causes the clinical symptoms and, hence, the accurate selection of venom for curative treatment, is of great importance for the effectiveness and safety of venom immunotherapy. Objective: In this study, the contribution of component-resolved diagnostics (CRD) is evaluated in the diagnosis of Hymenoptera venom allergy. Method: Ninety-three patients from four different centers in Turkey were included in the study. Conventional tests, including prick and intradermal skin tests, with commercial venom extracts and serum specific IgE (sIgE) levels for whole venoms were performed. An sIgE analysis for venom allergen components, including rApi m 1, rApi m 2, rApi m 10, rVes v 1, rVes v 5, were evaluated by immunoblotting. Results: In conventional test results, 17 of 35 patients with bee venom allergy were positive to honey bee venom, whereas 18 patients were positive to bee and wasp venoms. In 28 of 35 patients with bee venom allergy, the diagnosis was confirmed with CRD. CRD revealed a sensitivity of 80% in patients with bee venom allergy. According to conventional tests, 7 of 24 patients with vespid venom allergy demonstrated sensitivity only to Vespula species, whereas 17 patients revealed double positivity. The total diagnostic sensitivity of Ves v 1 and Ves v 5 was calculated as 87.5%. Ten of 23 patients with a history of hypersensitivity to both venoms showed double sensitivity with CRD; one patient had cross-reactivity, one patient was found to be sensitive only to bee venom, and, eight patients were sensitive only to Vespula species. Eleven patients had an uncertain history in terms of the culprit insect type and six of them had double sensitivity in CRD. Conclusion: CRD seemed to be more helpful in diagnosing vespid venom allergy than bee venom allergy. It can also discriminate clinically significant sensitizations from irrelevant ones.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 100536
Author(s):  
Tamara Eitel ◽  
Kim Nikola Zeiner ◽  
Katharina Assmus ◽  
Hanns Ackermann ◽  
Nadja Zoeller ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Kacper Packi ◽  
Joanna Matysiak ◽  
Eliza Matuszewska ◽  
Anna Bręborowicz ◽  
Zdzisława Kycler ◽  
...  

Hymenoptera venom allergy significantly affects the quality of life. Due to the divergences in the results of the available test and clinical symptoms of patients, the current widely applied diagnostic methods are often insufficient to classify patients for venom immunotherapy (VIT). Therefore it is still needed to search for new, more precise, and accurate diagnostic methods. Hence, this research aimed to discover new biomarkers of Hymenoptera venom allergy in a group of inflammation factors using set of multi-marker Bioplex panel. The adoption of a novel methodology based on Luminex/xMAP enabled simultaneous determination of serum levels of 37 different inflammatory proteins in one experiment. The study involved 21 patients allergic to wasp and/or honey bee venom and 42 healthy participants. According to univariate and multivariate statistics, soluble CD30/tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 8 (sCD30/TNFRSF8), and the soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (sTNF-R1) may be considered as effective prognostic factors, their circulating levels were significantly decreased in the allergy group (p-value < 0.05; the Area Under the Curve (AUC) ~0.7; Variable Importance in Projection (VIP) scores >1.2). The obtained results shed new light on the allergic inflammatory response and may contribute to modification and improvement of the diagnostic and monitoring methods. Further, large-scale studies are still needed to explain mechanisms of action of studied compounds and to definitively prove their usefulness in clinical practice.


Author(s):  
Charles F. Schuler ◽  
Sofija Volertas ◽  
Dilawar Khokhar ◽  
Huseyin Yuce ◽  
Lu Chen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-211
Author(s):  
Luca Pecoraro ◽  
Mattia Giovannini ◽  
Francesca Mori ◽  
Francesca Saretta ◽  
Simona Barni ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 222-229
Author(s):  
Ewa Cichocka-Jarosz ◽  
Piotr Brzyski ◽  
Urszula Jedynak-Wąsowicz ◽  
Marita Nittner-Marszalska ◽  
Immunotherapy Section Working Group

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (01) ◽  
pp. 45-50
Author(s):  
Katharina Aßmus ◽  
Markus Meissner ◽  
Roland Kaufmann ◽  
Eva Maria Valesky

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document