stopover habitat
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

47
(FIVE YEARS 14)

H-INDEX

12
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. David Blount ◽  
Joshua J. Horns ◽  
Kyle D. Kittelberger ◽  
Montague H. C. Neate-Clegg ◽  
Çağan Hakkı Şekercioğlu

An estimated 17% of migratory bird species are threatened or near threatened with extinction. This represents an enormous potential loss of biodiversity and cost to human societies due to the economic benefits that birds provide through ecosystem services and ecotourism. Conservation of migratory bird species presents many unique challenges, as these birds rely on multiple geographically distinct habitats, including breeding grounds, non-breeding grounds, and stopover sites during migration. In particular, stopover habitats are seldom studied relative to breeding and non-breeding habitats, despite their importance as refueling stations for migratory birds. In this study, we summarize the current research on the use of temporary primary crops by birds during migration and we assess the species characteristics and agricultural practices most often associated with the use of cropland as stopover habitat. First, we conducted a systematic review of the literature to document the effects various farming practices and crop types have on the abundance and diversity of migratory birds using agricultural areas for stopovers. Second, we analyzed the ecological correlates of bird species in the Northern Hemisphere that predict which species may use these areas while migrating. We ran a GLMM to test whether primary diet, diet breadth, primary habitat, habitat breadth, or realm predicted stopover use of agricultural areas. Our review suggests that particular crop types (principally rice, corn, and sunflower), as well as farming practices that result in higher non-cultivated plant diversity, encourage the use of agricultural areas by migrating birds. We found that cropland is used as stopover habitat by bird species that can utilize a large breadth of habitats, as well as species with preferences for habitat similar in structure to agricultural areas.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron T. Pearse ◽  
Kristine L. Metzger ◽  
David A. Brandt ◽  
Jill A. Shaffer ◽  
Mark T. Bidwell ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-49
Author(s):  
Emily B. Cohen ◽  
Kyle G. Horton ◽  
Peter P. Marra ◽  
Hannah L. Clipp ◽  
Andrew Farnsworth ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellie Roark ◽  
Willson Gaul

ABSTRACTBecause birds are frequently detected by sound, autonomous audio recorders (called automated recording units or ARUs) are now an established tool in addition to in-person observations for monitoring the status and trends of bird populations. ARUs have been evaluated and applied during breeding seasons, and to monitor the nocturnal flight calls of migrating birds. However, birds behave differently during migration stopover than during the breeding season. Here we present a method for using ARUs to monitor land birds in migration stopover habitat.We conducted in-person point counts next to continuously recording ARUs, and compared estimates of the number of species detected and focal species relative abundance from point counts and ARUs. We used a desk-based audio bird survey method for processing audio recordings, which does not require automated species identification algorithms. We tested two methods of using extended duration ARU recording: surveying consecutive minutes, and surveying randomly selected minutes.Desk-based surveys using randomly selected minutes from extended duration ARU recordings performed similarly to point counts, and better than desk-based surveys using consecutive minutes from ARU recordings. Surveying randomly selected minutes from ARUs provided estimates of relative abundance that were strongly correlated with estimates from point counts, and successfully showed the increase in abundance associated with migration timing. Randomly selected minutes also provided estimates of the number of species present that were comparable to estimates from point counts.ARUs are an effective way to track migration timing and intensity in remote or seasonally inaccessible migration stopover habitats. We recommend that desk-based surveys use randomly sampled minutes from extended duration ARU recordings, rather than using consecutive minutes from recordings. Our methods can be immediately applied by researchers with the skills to conduct point counts, with no additional expertise necessary in automated species identification algorithms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document