free protein
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

1242
(FIVE YEARS 232)

H-INDEX

71
(FIVE YEARS 11)

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillaume Graciani ◽  
John T. King ◽  
Francois Amblard

Author(s):  
Emily Long Zhao ◽  
Mehran Soltani ◽  
Addison K. Smith ◽  
J. Porter Hunt ◽  
Thomas A. Knotts ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Conary Meyer ◽  
Chuqing Zhou ◽  
Zecong Fang ◽  
Marjorie L. Longo ◽  
Tingrui Pan ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alicia K. Aquino ◽  
Zachary A. Manzer ◽  
Susan Daniel ◽  
Matthew P. DeLisa

In recent years, cell-free synthetic glycobiology technologies have emerged that enable production and remodeling of glycoproteins outside the confines of the cell. However, many of these systems combine multiple synthesis steps into one pot where there can be competing reactions and side products that ultimately lead to low yield of the desired product. In this work, we describe a microfluidic platform that integrates cell-free protein synthesis, glycosylation, and purification of a model glycoprotein in separate compartments where each step can be individually optimized. Microfluidics offer advantages such as reaction compartmentalization, tunable residence time, the ability to tether enzymes for reuse, and the potential for continuous manufacturing. Moreover, it affords an opportunity for spatiotemporal control of glycosylation reactions that is difficult to achieve with existing cell-based and cell-free glycosylation systems. In this work, we demonstrate a flow-based glycoprotein synthesis system that promotes enhanced cell-free protein synthesis, efficient protein glycosylation with an immobilized oligosaccharyltransferase, and enrichment of the protein product from cell-free lysate. Overall, this work represents a first-in-kind glycosylation-on-a-chip prototype that could find use as a laboratory tool for mechanistic dissection of the protein glycosylation process as well as a biomanufacturing platform for small batch, decentralized glycoprotein production.


Author(s):  
Nathan D. McDonald ◽  
Katherine A. Rhea ◽  
Kimberly L. Berk ◽  
Julie L. Zacharko ◽  
Aleksandr E. Miklos

Biomolecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 1741
Author(s):  
Carla M. Kumbale ◽  
Eberhard O. Voit ◽  
Qiang Zhang

Signal amplification in biomolecular networks converts a linear input to a steeply sigmoid output and is central to a number of cellular functions including proliferation, differentiation, homeostasis, adaptation, and biological rhythms. One canonical signal amplifying motif is zero-order ultrasensitivity that is mediated through the posttranslational modification (PTM) cycle of signaling proteins. The functionality of this signaling motif has been examined conventionally by supposing that the total amount of the protein substrates remains constant, as by the classical Koshland–Goldbeter model. However, covalent modification of signaling proteins often results in changes in their stability, which affects the abundance of the protein substrates. Here, we use mathematical models to explore the signal amplification properties in such scenarios and report some novel aspects. Our analyses indicate that PTM-induced protein stabilization brings the enzymes closer to saturation. As a result, ultrasensitivity may emerge or is greatly enhanced, with a steeper sigmoidal response, higher magnitude, and generally longer response time. In cases where PTM destabilizes the protein, ultrasensitivity can be regained through changes in the activities of the involved enzymes or from increased protein synthesis. Importantly, ultrasensitivity is not limited to modified or unmodified protein substrates—when protein turnover is considered, the total free protein substrate can also exhibit ultrasensitivity under several conditions. When full enzymatic reactions are used instead of Michaelis–Menten kinetics for the modeling, the total free protein substrate can even exhibit nonmonotonic dose–response patterns. It is conceivable that cells use inducible protein stabilization as a strategy in the signaling network to boost signal amplification while saving energy by keeping the protein substrate levels low at basal conditions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document