anterior arch
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

117
(FIVE YEARS 24)

H-INDEX

14
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2022 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 31
Author(s):  
Graziano Montaruli ◽  
Simona Virgilio ◽  
Michele Laurenziello ◽  
Michele Tepedino ◽  
Domenico Ciavarella

The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the efficiency of two biologically oriented devices in achieving maxillary expansion: Rapid Palatal Expander (RPE) and Nitanium Palatal Expander-2 (NPE-2). Thirty-six subjects, divided in two equal groups, were included in this study. Maxillary dental arches were scanned using Trios 3 shape®, in order to perform a digital analysis of 3D models. The models were analyzed using Autodesk Fusion 360® and Meshmixer®. All data obtained from analysis of pre-treatment and post-treatment models were processed using Prism® software. The anterior arch width, the posterior arch width, the palate height, and palatal surface were measured to evaluate differences between the devices. A D’Agostino–Pearson normality test was done to check the data. A non-parametric t-test was used to compare the anterior and posterior arch width between the two groups, while a parametric t-test was used to compare the palatal height measurements between the two groups. The p-value was calculated. The limit value fixed was 0.05. Palatal width and surface showed a significant increase in both groups, but no significant changes in palatal height were found. The data processed showed that there were no significant differences between the devices (ΔREP−ΔNPE) in variation of anterior arch width, there were no significant differences in variation of posterior arch width and there were no significant differences in variation of palatal height. The comparison between the two groups showed that both methods were equally effective in correcting transverse defect.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 180-185
Author(s):  
Vyachaslav V. Semyonov ◽  
Andrei M. Tsiatsiuyev

A case of missile group identification by comparative examination using the image superposition method is presented. Identification was carried out using a skeletonized body vault exit gunshot fracture. The exit gunshot buttonhole fracture shape and dimensions reflected the bullet caliber and its flank profile. The entrance injury located on the anterior arch of the first cervical vertebra and the basilar part of the occipital bone, in this case, had no identification significance.


2021 ◽  
Vol 87 (3) ◽  
pp. 411-418
Author(s):  
Hossam Hosny ◽  
Mohamed Ali Mohamed ◽  
Moustafa Elsayed ◽  
Ashraf Marzouk ◽  
Wael Salama

Unstable pelvic injuries are considered uncommon and they are usually associated with high rate of morbidity and mortality. High energy blunt trauma and falling from height are usually the main mechanism of injury. It is a retrospective study that was performed in academic level I trauma center. From September 2015 to December 2019, a consecutive series of 26 patients (7 females), with average age of 32 years with unstable pelvic fracture were included in this study. All patients underwent reduction and percutaneous fixation with one sacroiliac screw posteriorly for each sacroiliac joint and anterior arch fixation of the pelvic ring with either platting or external fixator. The average duration of follow up was 36 months. Clinical results: at the final follow-up, all patients had complete radiological healing of the fractures. The subjective functional assessment yielded excellent for twenty-two patients, good for two patients and fair for two patients. Posterior arch fixation of the pelvic ring with one sacroiliac screw beside anterior arch fixation in unstable fracture pelvis is a sufficient fixation method to maintain the requiring stability to allow complete union of the fracture. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 228-242
Author(s):  
Ha-eun Moon ◽  
Hyunmin Kim ◽  
Mirinae Park ◽  
Gyu-Hyeng Lee ◽  
Min-Hee Oh ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Hanna N. Algattas ◽  
David O. Okonkwo ◽  
Carl Snyderman ◽  
Paul A. Gardner ◽  
Eric W. Wang ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Agnieszka Boron ◽  
Monica Epelman ◽  
Chetan Shah ◽  
Andrea Scherer ◽  
Tushar Chandra

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanna Algattas ◽  
David O. Okonkwo ◽  
Carl H. Snyderman ◽  
Paul A. Gardner ◽  
Eric W. Wang ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 84-87
Author(s):  
Tohru Sano ◽  
Akira Isoshima ◽  
Keita Hashimoto ◽  
Hideki Arakawa ◽  
Satoru Tochigi ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Tatsuhiko Fujiwara ◽  
Koji Akeda ◽  
Norihiko Takegami ◽  
Junichi Yamada ◽  
Akihiro Sudo

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document