elective case
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

10
(FIVE YEARS 7)

H-INDEX

2
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. e001143
Author(s):  
James Meacock ◽  
Soumya Mukherjee ◽  
Asim Sheikh

At Leeds General Infirmary, a busy tertiary centre for neurosurgery, there has been little visibility of the step-down status of the patients from intensive care to high dependency or from the latter to a ward bed. The only record of the current situation was limited to the paper notes of the bed managers. Furthermore, accuracy of electronic systems used for staffing levels and bed state were underused. There were gaps in information and furthermore information within the system was unreliable (together defined as ‘defects’). These defects mandated bed managers’ physical presence on each ward to obtain reliable data. This led to unwarranted critical care stays and resultant high rates (up to 40%) of elective operation cancellations requiring a critical care bed.The Leeds Improvement Method using principles of the Toyota Production System aimed to improve patient flow through critical care and to assess the impact on elective case activity. Problems were identified and changes were implemented over a 1-week period. The changes included measures to reduce time taken for collation of critical bed-state information and improving patient and staffing data quality collected in the electronic patient management system (EPMS) and electronic staffing record (ESR). Impact was monitored for 30 days pre-implementation and post-implementation.Following intervention, the time taken by the bed manager to gather live bed-state information decreased from 50 to 9 min; the EPMS storing correct bed-state data was improved from 71% to 0% defect; the ESR was improved from 100% to 4% defects; critical care patient step-downs occurring at night (after 20:00) improved from 80% to 20%; and the number of cancelled elective cases over a 30-day period reduced from nine to one.Implementing these organisational efficiencies can significantly improve critical care patient flow and elective case throughput.


2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 712-716
Author(s):  
Nathanael Macdonald ◽  
Caterina Clements ◽  
Anshul Sobti ◽  
Daniel Rossiter ◽  
Ashwin Unnithan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background In April 2020, Covid-19 brought NHS elective procedures to a halt. The aim of this paper is to produce accurate forecasts on the building backlog, highlight the state of waiting lists currently and propose solutions required to prevent a public health crisis. Method Using data published by NHS digital and NHS England on previous years, we have analysed and used this to produce estimates of cancellations and missed cases. We also analyse government data on waiting lists and show compliance or lack of with these. Results We show that compliance with waiting list times pre pandemic was falling year on year (83.2% in 2020 down from 87% in 2019). Every month that passes we estimate that 400 000 cases are not being performed. This may include urgent cancer care work in some trusts. Conclusions Waiting lists have been governed by strict rules since 2004. Given falling compliance with 18-week intention to treat we believe the scale of the backlog combined with NHS capacity diminished due to Covid-19 precautions is a public health crisis waiting to occur. We identify difficulties in resuming elective work and suggest strategies that could be employed to avoid a public health crisis.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 4
Author(s):  
Kedar Phadke ◽  
Provash Saha

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amina Solak ◽  
Haris Pandza ◽  
Edin Beciragic ◽  
Amila Husic ◽  
Ida Tursunovic ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael M. Hadeed ◽  
Vandan D. Patel ◽  
Wendy M. Novicoff ◽  
Frank Winston Gwathmey

2012 ◽  
Vol 215 (3) ◽  
pp. S45-S46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas D. Andersen ◽  
Jennifer M. Hanna ◽  
Syamal D. Bhattacharya ◽  
Judson B. Williams ◽  
Jeffrey G. Gaca ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document