Kinematic restoration of the southern North Atlantic and the Alpine Tethys during the Mesozoic

<p>Continental rifting preceding stable seafloor spreading is characterized by a multistage evolution during lithosphere extension. Wide regions of exhumed mantle contain linear magnetic anomalies with a strongly debated nature and origin. Contrasting information used to set up dynamic plate models has resulted in a plethora of alternative interpretations. Structural and stratigraphic records at plate boundaries show indeed variable degree of discrepancies with what expected from computed plate motions during rifting stages. The definition of robust spatial and temporal kinematic constraints using combined offshore and onshore approaches represents a major challenge to unravel rifted margins evolution.   <br> <br>In this study, we address the problem outlined above using the Mesozoic southern North Atlantic and the Alpine Tethys, west and east of the Iberian plate, as a natural laboratory. The two systems are part of the same Africa-Europe kinematic framework and record distinctive Mesozoic rift events and a subsequent Tertiary compression. While in the southern North Atlantic the kinematic framework is still preserved, in the Alpine Tethys, subsequent subduction/collision erased the paleogeographic framework. The study area is among the best investigated but also most debated geological domains on the globe.</p><p>In our analysis we (1) integrate rift domains in plate kinematic models and re-consider the nature of the magnetic anomaly J in the southern N-Atlantic; (2) discuss the results of recent studies in the northern part of the Iberian plate; and (3) show new data from the Alpine Tethys realm (Central European Alps and Southern Apennines). We discuss the implications of these observations for the geometry of the rift systems developed around Iberia.</p><p>Our robust data network radically reduces the range of possible kinematic solutions. We reconstruct thus the position of Iberia and Adria relative to Europe and Africa and we evaluate the kinematic evolution and the width of the southern North Atlantic and the Alpine Tethys domains during the Mesozoic. The analysis emphasizes (1) the stepping geometry of the plate boundary for the Atlantic-Tethys interaction, (2) the strong partitioning of deformation in time and space, and (3) the large-scale pattern of coeval compression and extension along the Africa-Europe diffuse plate boundary region.</p>

What Iberian dinosaurs reveal about the bridge said to exist between Gondwana and Laurasia in the Early Cretaceous

Some Cretaceous dinosaur taxa with a broad enough record on the continents of the northern hemisphere (Laurasia) or in the southern continents (Gondwana) have been interpreted as Laurasian or Gondwanan in origin. The occasional presence of these taxa outside Laurasia or Gondwana respectively has frequently been explained in terms of dispersal from their place of origin by means of land bridges that are indeterminate in location and character. One example of such a dispersal event is provided by the Early Cretaceous dinosaurs of Europe and Africa. Certain European taxa have been interpreted as having their origin in Gondwana. If we regard these presences common to both areas as being the result of a point of communication between Laurasia and western Gondwana or at least of sporadic flows in both directions during the Early Cretaceous, we may opt for dispersal as an explanation. It has been assumed that there was an intercontinental bridge between Africa and Europe passing through the archipelago of which Iberia formed a part. This interpretation emerged from the idea that such a bridge existed in the Late Jurassic, explaining the presence of similar ornithopod dinosaurs in Africa and Europe. However, from the end of the Early Jurassic a period of “rift” began on the southern Iberian margin, entailing the formation of a sedimentary furrow with pelagic sedimentation in what is known as the Subbetic zone. Moreover, the differences in the observed dinosaur fauna between western Gondwana and the Iberian Peninsula in the Neocomian can be explained as the result of endemism and regional extinctions. The archipelago that formed the Iberian plate was Laurasia’s closest continental mass to Gondwana during the Neocomian, yet there was still a separation of several hundred kilometres of open ocean without islands. Such a barrier would seem difficult for dinosaurs to overcome. As such, we lack proof of communication between the two supercontinents via Iberia during the Neocomian. The situation appears to change in the Barremian-Aptian transition. Some of the taxa present in the Hauterivian-Barremian of Europe are recorded in Gondwana from the Aptian onwards. This can possibly be explained in terms of the more complete record that exists, but it cannot be ruled out that a communication was established between Gondwana and Laurasia at the end of the Barremian. For the time being, we lack geological support for this bridge in Iberia, yet it might be located in Apulia, where there is a great development of shallow-shelf carbonates with dinosaur remains from the period in question.