logarithmic space
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

76
(FIVE YEARS 13)

H-INDEX

11
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aggelos Kiayias ◽  
Nikos Leonardos ◽  
Dionysis Zindros
Keyword(s):  

Computability ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Merlin Carl

An important theorem in classical complexity theory is that REG = LOGLOGSPACE, i.e., that languages decidable with double-logarithmic space bound are regular. We consider a transfinite analogue of this theorem. To this end, we introduce deterministic ordinal automata (DOAs) and show that they satisfy many of the basic statements of the theory of deterministic finite automata and regular languages. We then consider languages decidable by an ordinal Turing machine (OTM), introduced by P. Koepke in 2005 and show that if the working space of an OTM is of strictly smaller cardinality than the input length for all sufficiently long inputs, the language so decided is also decidable by a DOA, which is a transfinite analogue of LOGLOGSPACE ⊆ REG; the other direction, however, is easily seen to fail.


2021 ◽  
Vol Volume 17, Issue 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakub Michaliszyn ◽  
Jan Otop ◽  
Piotr Wieczorek

We propose a new approach to querying graph databases. Our approach balances competing goals of expressive power, language clarity and computational complexity. A distinctive feature of our approach is the ability to express properties of minimal (e.g. shortest) and maximal (e.g. most valuable) paths satisfying given criteria. To express complex properties in a modular way, we introduce labelling-generating ontologies. The resulting formalism is computationally attractive - queries can be answered in non-deterministic logarithmic space in the size of the database.


Algorithmica ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arindam Biswas ◽  
Venkatesh Raman ◽  
Saket Saurabh
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mika Hirvensalo ◽  
Etienne Moutot ◽  
Abuzer Yakaryılmaz

AbstractWe present new results on the computational limitations of affine automata (AfAs). First, we show that using the endmarker does not increase the computational power of AfAs. Second, we show that the computation of bounded-error rational-valued AfAs can be simulated in logarithmic space. Third, we identify some logspace unary languages that are not recognized by algebraic-valued AfAs. Fourth, we show that using arbitrary real-valued transition matrices and state vectors does not increase the computational power of AfAs in the unbounded-error model. When focusing only the rational values, we obtain the the same result also for bounded error. As a consequence, we show that the class of bounded-error affine languages remains the same when the AfAs are restricted to use rational numbers only.


2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 1892-1922
Author(s):  
Jack Murtagh ◽  
Omer Reingold ◽  
Aaron Sidford ◽  
Salil Vadhan
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (39) ◽  
pp. 22551-22566
Author(s):  
Javad Hekayati ◽  
Sona Raeissi

A new mathematical space is proposed for the first time with significant benefits over the conventional logarithmic space in linearizing the effect of T variations on viscosity data for concurrent modeling of the viscosity of pure compounds and mixtures.


2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (08) ◽  
pp. 1317-1333
Author(s):  
Maksims Dimitrijevs ◽  
Abuzer Yakaryılmaz

We investigate the minimal cases for realtime probabilistic machines that can define uncountably many languages with bounded error. We show that logarithmic space is enough for realtime PTMs on unary languages. On non-unary case, we obtain the same result for double logarithmic space, which is also tight. When replacing the work tape with a few counters, we can still achieve similar results for unary linear-space two-counter automata, unary sublinear-space three-counter automata, and non-unary sublinear-space two-counter automata. We also show how to slightly improve the sublinear-space constructions by using more counters.


Author(s):  
Frank Vega

P versus NP is considered as one of the most important open problems in computer science. This consists in knowing the answer of the following question: Is P equal to NP? A precise statement of the P versus NP problem was introduced independently by Stephen Cook and Leonid Levin. Since that date, all efforts to find a proof for this problem have f ailed. NP is the complexity class of languages defined b y p olynomial t ime v erifiers M su ch th at wh en th e in put is an el ement of the language with its certificate, then M outputs a string which belongs to a single language in P. Another major complexity classes are L and NL. The certificate-based definition of NL is based on logarithmic space Turing machine with an additional special read-once input tape: This is called a logarithmic space verifier. NL is the complexity class of languages defined by logarithmic space verifiers M s uch t hat when t he i nput i s a n e lement o f t he l anguage with i ts c ertificate, th en M outputs 1. To attack the P versus NP problem, the NP-completeness is a useful concept. We demonstrate there is an NP-complete language defined by a logarithmic space verifier M such that when the input is an element of the language with its certificate, then M outputs a s tring which belongs to a single language in L. In this way, we obtain if L is not equal to NL, then P = NP. In addition, we show that L is not equal to NL. Hence, we prove the complexity class P is equal to NP.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document