formation of finite groups
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

6
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

3
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2010 ◽  
Vol 87 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 258-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaolan Yi ◽  
L. A. Shemetkov

2008 ◽  
Vol 01 (04) ◽  
pp. 619-629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nanying Yang ◽  
Wenbin Guo

Let G be a finite group and denote a formation of finite groups by [Formula: see text]. We call a subgroup H of G[Formula: see text]-supplemented in G if there exists a normal subgroup K of G such that G = HK and (H ∩ K)HG/HG is contained in the [Formula: see text]-hypercenter [Formula: see text] of G/HG. In this paper, we use [Formula: see text]-supplemented subgroups to study the structure of finite groups. Some known results in the literature are generalized.


2008 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-106
Author(s):  
GIL KAPLAN ◽  
DAN LEVY

AbstractLet α be a formation of finite groups which is closed under subgroups and group extensions and which contains the formation of solvable groups. Let G be any finite group. We state and prove equivalences between conditions on chief factors of G and structural characterizations of the α-residual and theα-radical of G. We also discuss the connection of our results to the generalized Fitting subgroup of G.


1990 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 267-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Förster

We study the following question: given any local formation of finite groups, do there exist maximal local subformations? An answer is given by providing a local definition of the intersection of all maximal local subformations.


1985 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Förster ◽  
E. Salomon

It is well known that every local formation of finite soluble groups possesses three distinguished local definitions consisting of finite soluble groups: the minimal one, the full and integrated one, and the maximal one. As far as the first and the second of these are concerned, this statement remains true in the context of arbitrary finite groups. Doerk, Šemetkov, and Schmid have posed the problem of whether every local formation of finite groups has a distinguished (that is, unique) maximal local definition. In this paper a description of local formations with a unique maximal local definition is given, from which counter-examples emerge. Furthermore, a criterion for a formation function to be a local definition of a given local formation is obtained.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document