Rank Status and Happiness in India: A Panel Ordered Probit Estimation of the Effect of Ordinal Relative Comparison on Well-being

Most often the social comparison or relative income hypothesis has been used as an explanation for the lack of systematic relationship between income and happiness, using the ordered probit regression method. The identification of relevant reference group and the estimation of the differential effects of comparison income have been controversial. To overcome these twin issues, this paper uses an ordinal comparison income approach based on rich/poor dichotomy and rank income. The rank income of an individual is defined as his relative position in the income distribution within the reference group and the average income of the reference group is used to define the rich/poor classification. The differential effects of ordinal incomes across life satisfaction distribution is estimated by the panel fixed effects ordered profit regression model using the WVS data for India. The estimated results show that ordinal income comparison, rather than cardinal average reference income, is a better predictor of life satisfaction levels. Raising income level is relatively important for less satisfied people while increasing rank status is important for highly satisfied people in India.

Exploratory Study of Comparison Income and Individual Debt Using British Household Panel Survey

The famous saying “keeping up with the Joneses” is a generational behaviour that is still deeply interwoven in the behavioural fabric of our modern-day society. This paper aims to address and contribute to the existing literature by investigating the determinants of individual non-mortgage debt, focusing on the role of comparison income. It also seeks to overcome certain empirical shortcomings by applying Tobit, fixed effects, and Tobit fixed effects regression models to a UK dataset. The study is motivated by previous research, which suggested the aspiration of borrowers is influential in the debt-decision process. Previous studies did not use empirical methods or UK data, however. Comparison income (the measure of the borrowers’ aspiration) is derived from the Mincer earnings equation. Tobit regression is applied in the cross-section analysis and is pertinent considering the censored nature of the dependent variable. In the panel analysis, fixed effects and Tobit fixed effects are used to control for unobserved attributes of sampled individuals that may affect demand for debt. Comparison income and non-mortgage debt as well as other economic and demographic variables are positively and significantly associated. The relationship between comparison income and non-mortgage debt suggests the latter may be incurred for status-maintenance purposes.