graft insertion
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

76
(FIVE YEARS 12)

H-INDEX

14
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lifeng Yin ◽  
Hua Zhang ◽  
Junbo Liu ◽  
xingyu zhang ◽  
zhengxing wen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Cortical suspensory femoral fixation is commonly performed for graft fixation of the femur in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using hamstring tendons. This study aimed to compare the morphology of femoral tunnel and graft insertion between fixed-length loop devices (FLD) and adjustable-length loop devices (ALD) using computed tomography (CT) images on the first day after hamstring ACL reconstruction. Methods: Overall, 94 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction from January 2016 to January 2021 were included. For femoral graft fixation, FLD (Smith & Nephew, ENDOBUTTON) and ALD (DePuy Synthes, Mitek sports medicine, RIGIDLOOP Adjustable cortical system) were used in 56 and 38 patients, respectively (FLD and ALD groups). For evaluation of the morphology of the humeral tunnel and graft depth, CT scans were performed immediately on the first postoperative day. The gap distance between the top of the graft and the socket tunnel end, the length of lateral bone preservation, and the depth of graft insertion were measured on the CT images. Results: The gap distance and bone preservation significantly differed between the two groups (1.90±1.81 mm and 14.35±4.67 mm in ALD groups; 7.08±2.63 mm and 7.35±3.62 mm in FLD groups, respectively; both P values < 0.01). The graft insertion depth did not significantly differ between the groups. Conclusion: The ALD group had a smaller gap distance, better bone preservation, and a similar graft insertion length in the femoral tunnel when compared to the FLD group. Based on these findings, ALD might be better for bone preservation and tunnel utilization in patients with short femoral tunnels. Trial registration: retrospectively registered


2020 ◽  
Vol 62 ◽  
pp. 498.e15-498.e17
Author(s):  
Jonathan P. O'Doherty ◽  
Karl A. Holden ◽  
Abigail Johnson ◽  
Pat Cain ◽  
James Harding ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (7) ◽  
pp. 536-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan D. White ◽  
Can Hazar ◽  
David Jarosz ◽  
Paul Walker ◽  
David Shaw ◽  
...  

Background: This retrospective case series aims to evaluate the efficacy of the Perclose ProGlide system for postoperative hemostasis following aortic stent-graft insertion. Material and Methods: A prospectively maintained database of patients with a minimum follow-up of 12 months following percutaneous aortic procedures was interrogated. Preprocedural computed tomography (CT) scans were reviewed to assess existing stenosis in the common femoral artery (CFA). Arteries with an estimated stenosis of greater than 25% on visual inspection underwent quantification using multiplanar and curved planar reformation. The preoperative and 1-year follow-up CTs of these patients were assessed for change in stenosis. Analysis was performed by 2 independent reviewers, with senior authors reviewing any discrepancies. Results: One hundred forty-two endovascular aortic aneurysm repairs (EVARs) were performed. The ProGlide system was used in 235 arteries, yielding a high success rate in obtaining postprocedural hemostasis (94%). There were 13 postprocedural access-related complications, including 5 patients requiring surgical closure due to inadequate seal. Two patients required thrombectomy due to distal embolization. One patient required CFA endarterectomy at 6 months for the treatment of preexisting short distance claudication. Vessel analysis was performed in 31 arteries. Mean preoperative stenosis was 32% (range: 20%-57%). Mean postoperative stenosis was 32% (21%-57%). No significant change in degree of stenosis was detected (defined as a 5% change). Conclusions: The ProGlide system yielded a high success rate in obtaining postoperative hemostasis with low rate of conversion to surgical closure and low complication rates. There was no evidence of worsening vessel stenosis in arteries with preprocedural stenotic disease. Level of Evidence: Level 4, Case Series.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document