optimal periodic control
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

80
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

11
(FIVE YEARS 0)



2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 547-571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Térence Bayen ◽  
◽  
Alain Rapaport ◽  
Fatima-Zahra Tani ◽  




2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 110-124
Author(s):  
Shengbo Eben Li ◽  
Xiaoxue Zhang ◽  
Renjie Li ◽  
Zhitao Wang ◽  
Hailiang Chen ◽  
...  


PAMM ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Zuyev ◽  
Andreas Seidel-Morgenstern ◽  
Peter Benner


2019 ◽  
Vol 99 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Jbili ◽  
K. Hamraoui ◽  
S. J. Glaser ◽  
J. Salomon ◽  
D. Sugny


IEEE Access ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 3406-3421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenkai Wang ◽  
Zhongxi Hou ◽  
Shangqiu Shan ◽  
Lili Chen


Author(s):  
Mohammad Ghanaatpishe ◽  
Yağiz E. Bayiz ◽  
Bo Cheng ◽  
Hosam K. Fathy

This paper uses optimal periodic control (OPC) theory as a framework for assessing the relative efficiency of revolving versus flapping wing trajectories in insect-sized flight problems. The literature already offers both experimental and simulation-based comparisons between these two flight modes. A collective conclusion from these studies is that the potential advantages of flapping flight depend on many factors such as Reynolds number, wing size/morphology, wing kinematic constraints, aerodynamic efficiency metrics, etc. This makes it necessary to develop a unified framework for comparing these flight modes under various conditions. We address this need by using the π test from OPC theory as a tool for analyzing the degree to which one can improve the efficiency of steady rotary hovering flight through periodic trajectory perturbations. A quasi-steady insect flight model from the literature is adopted as a case study. The paper applies the π test to this model. It then concludes by solving for the optimal lift-power Pareto fronts for both flight modes, and using these Pareto fronts to confirm the results predicted by the π test.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document