bipartite patella
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

98
(FIVE YEARS 17)

H-INDEX

16
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2022 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 725-728
Author(s):  
Zineb Zerouali Boukhal ◽  
Hasna Belgadir ◽  
Abdelhamid Jadib ◽  
Omar Amriss ◽  
Achta Adam Fadoul ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Kriletić ◽  
Morana Vuković ◽  
Mario Carić

Here we present six adult patellae with superolateral concave defects observed amongst the remains of at least 28 individuals retrieved from four Late Iron Age burials from Kneževići hillfort - Malo Libinje, Croatia. The right patella of an adult individual displays a rough-edged concave defect on superolateral side of the bone called bipartite patella. Other five patellae show concave defects with smooth edges also located on superolateral side; a defect known as vastus notch. Though physically similar, the two conditions are etiologically distinct. A large amount of observed cases of vastus notch in this assemblage may indicate that these individuals frequently performed activities involving kneeling and/or squatting. This is the first documented case of joint occurrence of bipartite patella and vastus notch in a Croatian skeletal assemblage, but also the largest amount of patellae with vastus notch in an archaeological population from Croatia recorded so far.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 232596712110222
Author(s):  
Allison Loewen ◽  
Susan M. Ge ◽  
Yousef Marwan ◽  
Mark Burman ◽  
Paul A. Martineau

Background: Bipartite patella is a rare congenital condition that becomes painful following direct trauma or an overuse injury. If it remains painful despite nonoperative treatment, surgery may be warranted. The current gold standard is open fragment excision or lateral release; however, arthroscopic management is also possible. Purpose: To investigate the safety and efficacy of arthroscopic treatment of painful bipartite patella. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Using Medline and Embase, we systematically reviewed the literature as of March 8, 2020, using the subject headings “bipartite patella” and “arthroscopy” and related key terms. All levels of evidence involving human studies in English were included. Articles were excluded if only the abstract was published or the study was related to nonsurgical treatment or nonrelated diagnoses. Data related to journal/article information, demographic/clinical data, arthroscopic technique, length of follow-up, treatment outcomes, and complications were extracted. Results: Eleven articles with 43 patients were included in the review. Most patients (n = 34; 79%) underwent arthroscopic lateral release, while 16% (n = 7) had arthroscopic excision of the accessory fragment and 5% (n = 2) had arthroscopic excision and release. All patients except for one, who experienced postoperative trauma, were pain-free after arthroscopic treatment and were able to return to sports after a mean 2.6 months. Conclusion: This review demonstrated that arthroscopic management of painful bipartite patella is a safe and effective alternative to open surgical excision or release. However, all articles were case studies or small case series, owing to the rarity of the condition. In the future, higher-level studies comparing arthroscopic techniques and postoperative rehabilitation programs should be performed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 801-805
Author(s):  
Anand Gupta ◽  
Abhishek Garg ◽  
Ankur Sahu ◽  
Umesh Yadav ◽  
Manmeet Malik ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Edward R. Floyd ◽  
Kari L. Falaas ◽  
Gregory B. Carlson ◽  
Jill Monson ◽  
Robert F. LaPrade

Author(s):  
Fidelis Marie Corpus-Zuñiga ◽  
Keiichi Muramatsu ◽  
Ma. Felma Rayel ◽  
Yasuhiro Tani ◽  
Tetsuya Seto

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. e236773
Author(s):  
Kiran Kumar Naikoti ◽  
Raghuram Thonse

Very few case reports have been reported on traumatic separation of the bipartite patella along with quadriceps tendon rupture. These reports relate to separation of superolateral bipartite patella (Saupe type 3). We describe a new variant which to our knowledge has not been described or classified so far, which is purely a superior bipartite patella with traumatic separation and complete functional disruption of the extensor mechanism of the knee in a young patient working in the army which was managed with open reduction and internal fixation along with repair of the extensor mechanism of the knee achieving complete functional recovery.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 232596712096712
Author(s):  
Jennifer Kallini ◽  
Lyle J. Micheli ◽  
Patricia E. Miller ◽  
Dennis E. Kramer ◽  
Mininder S. Kocher ◽  
...  

Background: Bipartite patella (BPP) is a developmental anomaly that forms when incomplete patellar ossification leaves a residual fibrocartilaginous synchondrosis between ossification centers. Repetitive traction forces across the synchondrosis can cause knee pain, most commonly presenting in adolescence. Symptoms frequently resolve with nonoperative management. Few surgical case series exist to guide treatment approaches for refractory pain. Purpose: To investigate the clinical features, surgical techniques, and outcomes associated with operative treatment of symptomatic BPP in pediatric and adolescent athletes and to compare features of the series with a large control group managed nonoperatively. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective medical record review was conducted of all patients aged ≤20 years who were diagnosed with symptomatic, radiologically confirmed BPP between 2003 and 2018 at a single tertiary-care pediatric hospital (N = 266). Demographic and clinical variables were analyzed, and additional radiologic and perioperative variables were collected for the surgical subcohort. Results: Of the 266 patients included, 27 were treated operatively (10.2%). When compared with those treated nonoperatively (with rest, physical therapy, cryotherapy, and anti-inflammatory medications), the operatively managed group experienced a longer duration of symptoms before first presentation (21.5 vs 7.6 months; P < .001) and were more likely to be older (mean age, 15.4 vs 12.4 years; P < .001), female (59.3% vs 35.6%; P = .03), and competitive athletes (100% vs 84.5%; P = .02). In the 27 patients treated operatively, procedures were categorized as isolated fragment excision (n = 9), fragment excision with lateral release (n = 8), isolated lateral release (n = 5), fragment screw fixation (n = 4), and synchondrosis drilling (n = 1). The mean time between surgery and return to sports was 2.2 months. Four patients (14.8%) reported residual symptoms requiring secondary surgery, including lateral release (n = 1), excision of residual fragment (n = 1), and fixation screw removal (n = 2). Conclusion: BPP can cause knee pain in adolescent athletes and is generally responsive to nonoperative treatment. Patients undergoing surgical treatment—most commonly female competitive athletes with prolonged symptoms—represented 10% of cases. A variety of surgical techniques may be effective, with a 15% risk of persistent or recurrent symptoms warranting reoperation. Prospective multicenter investigations are needed to identify optimal candidates for earlier interventions and the optimal operative treatment technique.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document