hatching order
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

42
(FIVE YEARS 4)

H-INDEX

16
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Author(s):  
Madison A. Rittinger ◽  
Rachel M. Bowden ◽  
Logan A. Sauers ◽  
Ryan T. Paitz ◽  
Christine J. Poppe ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 224 (1) ◽  
pp. jeb231290
Author(s):  
Tiia Kärkkäinen ◽  
Pauliina Teerikorpi ◽  
Wiebke Schuett ◽  
Antoine Stier ◽  
Toni Laaksonen

ABSTRACTEarly-life conditions are crucial determinants of phenotype and fitness. The effects of pre- and post-natal conditions on fitness prospects have been widely studied but their interactive effects have received less attention. In birds, asynchronous hatching creates challenging developmental conditions for the last-hatched chicks, but differential allocation in last-laid eggs might help to compensate this initial handicap. The relative importance and potential interaction between pre- and post-hatching developmental conditions for different fitness components remains mostly unknown. We manipulated hatching order in wild pied flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca), creating three groups: natural asynchrony (last-laid eggs hatching last), reversed asynchrony (last-laid eggs hatching first) and hatching synchrony (all eggs hatching at once). We examined the effects of these manipulations on early-life survival, growth and telomere length, a potential cellular biomarker of fitness prospects. Mortality was mostly affected by hatching order, with last-hatched chicks being more likely to die. Early-life telomere dynamics and growth were influenced by the interplays between laying and hatching order. Last-laid but first-hatched chicks were heavier but had shorter telomeres 5 days after hatching than their siblings, indicating rapid early growth with potential adverse consequences on telomere length. Synchronous chicks did not suffer any apparent cost of hatching synchronously. Impaired phenotypes only occurred when reversing the natural hatching order (i.e. developmental mismatch), suggesting that maternal investment in last-laid eggs might indeed counterbalance the initial handicap of last-hatched chicks. Our experimental study thus highlights that potential interplays between pre- and post-natal environments are likely to shape fitness prospects in the wild.


2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (17) ◽  
pp. 3316-3329
Author(s):  
Maxime Pineaux ◽  
Thomas Merkling ◽  
Etienne Danchin ◽  
Scott Hatch ◽  
David Duneau ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 509-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zitan Song ◽  
Yuqi Zou ◽  
Canshi Hu ◽  
Yuanxing Ye ◽  
Chao Wang ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. 20180658
Author(s):  
Keith W. Sockman

Birth or hatching order can affect fitness. It has long been assumed that the order in which a bird's egg is laid (its oviposition) and first exposed to incubation relative to other eggs in the nest determines the order in which it hatches and the subsequent effects on development and survival. To my knowledge, this cause of hatching order has not been tested while controlling for laying-order effects on egg composition. Like those of many species, the last-laid eggs in clutches of the Lincoln's sparrow ( Melospiza lincolnii ) hatch last and produce nestlings with reduced growth and survival rates. Last-hatched Lincoln's sparrows also develop wider bills that are associated with reduced attractiveness of adult courtship songs. Using wild, free-ranging Lincoln's sparrows, I replaced the first or fourth freshly laid egg in four-egg host nests with a freshly laid first egg from a donor nest. I discovered that the experimental elevation of oviposition—which controlled for egg composition—delayed hatching, inhibited growth and widened bill gape, thus confirming the mechanism for hatching order and revealing a potential role for oviposition in reproductive success. Similar effects of postnatal family position could affect fitness in other taxa, as well.


Ibis ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 159 (1) ◽  
pp. 230-234
Author(s):  
Gregorio Moreno-Rueda ◽  
Francisco Campos ◽  
Francisco Gutiérrez-Corchero ◽  
María Ángeles Hernández
Keyword(s):  

Ibis ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 158 (2) ◽  
pp. 327-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian C. T. Nisbet ◽  
David Monticelli ◽  
Jeffrey A. Spendelow ◽  
Patricia Szczys
Keyword(s):  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. e0138177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markéta Zárybnická ◽  
Jan Riegert ◽  
Lucie Brejšková ◽  
Jiří Šindelář ◽  
Marek Kouba ◽  
...  

Bird Study ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beatrice Sicurella ◽  
Mario Caffi ◽  
Manuela Caprioli ◽  
Diego Rubolini ◽  
Nicola Saino ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document