Postcolonial interpretations of Isaiah consider the complex interactions between imperial imposition, emulation, and resistance, attending particularly to expressions of cultural hybridity. The focus falls not just on anti-imperial impulses, such as the assertion of a national Judean identity, or proclamations of judgment against the empires of Assyria and Babylon, but also on the intercultural dynamics that reflect the tides of empire. Several of Isaiah’s texts mimic imperial administration in order to claim jurisdiction for Yhwh’s torah—not only within a limited national territory but also across the many nations of the empire. Isaiah’s vision of peaceable rule interacts with some distinctive features of Iranian royal ideology, including the symbolism of royal parklands. Isaiah’s Eden theology shows awareness of the Persian paradises and draws on this motif in proclaiming the rule of God in a this-worldly eschatology. Identifying King Cyrus as a messiah might well have sacrificed messianic hopes, but this is only an apparent concession to the ruling powers. While the gōlāh-oriented vision of Ezra laid claim to Persian authority, Isa 49–55 opposes this vision and envisages a reconciliation of Returnees and Remainees within Yhwh’s own empire.