rupert's land
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

64
(FIVE YEARS 5)

H-INDEX

2
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 102 (s1) ◽  
pp. s159-s177
Author(s):  
Alvin C. Gluek, Jr.

The Riel Rebellion presents an interesting case in Canadian-American history. For relations between the two nations, already strained by the Civil War, Fenian movements within the United States, and the American rejection of reciprocity, took a turn for the worse in 1869–70 when Canada was suddenly confronted with the insurrection in Rupert’s Land. Beguiled by the evasive dream of becoming a continental republic, Americans had long coveted the lands of their northern neighbour. That the new Dominion of Canada could survive – indeed, could dare to envision its own transcontinental glory – was inconceivable to many Americans. In their own self-interest, they exaggerated the signs of disaffection within the Dominion. And when the Metis of Rupert’s Land forcibly rejected political union with Canada, and certain citizens of British Columbia petitioned President Grant for admission into the United States, it seemed that all British North America was breaking up and that its separate members would soon become a part of the American family to which they “naturally” belonged.


2018 ◽  
Vol 99 (4) ◽  
pp. 655-657
Author(s):  
Michelle A. Lelièvre
Keyword(s):  

Ethnohistory ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 679-680
Author(s):  
Victoria Elena Castillo
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 109 (2) ◽  
pp. 238-262
Author(s):  
John S. Long ◽  
Richard J. Preston ◽  
Katrina Srigley ◽  
Lorraine Sutherland

In the 18th century the Indigenous peoples of the James Bay region shared land near the coast, a few resources, and furs from a vast hinterland with European newcomers. The Royal Proclamation of 1763 excluded Rupert’s Land – an appropriate decision for it was quite distinct from lands in the south where settlers were acquiring Indigenous land on the fee simple real estate model. What were the James Bay indigenous people’s conditions for sharing their land? It was arguably their principles, and not King George’s edict, that characterized the year 1763 at Moose Fort (Moose Factory). This paper draws on Hudson’s Bay Co. records to examine what was being shared with the newcomers in this northern region. Unlike in the southern regions, the newcomers had no intention of displacing Indigenous peoples. A modest sharing of land and a generous sharing of food and fur resources, on terms congenial to its first inhabitants, characterizes 1763 in this northern region.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document