nitrogen aggregation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

23
(FIVE YEARS 11)

H-INDEX

10
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 106 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-68
Author(s):  
Roy Bassoo ◽  
Kenneth S. Befus ◽  
Peng Liang ◽  
Steven L. Forman ◽  
Glenn Sharman

Abstract Diamonds have long been mined from alluvial terrace deposits within the rainforest of Guyana, South America. No primary kimberlite deposits have been discovered in Guyana, nor have there been previous studies on the mineralogy and origin of the diamonds. Paleoproterozoic terranes in Guyana are prospective to diamond occurrences because the most productive deposits are associated spatially with the eastern escarpment of the Paleoproterozoic Roraima Supergroup. Geographic proximity suggests that the diamonds are detrital grains eroding from the <1.98 Ga conglomerates, metamorphosed to zeolite and greenschist facies. The provenance and paragenesis of the alluvial diamonds are described using a suite of placer diamonds from different locations across the Guiana Shield. Guyanese diamonds are typically small, and those in our collection range from 0.3 to 2.7 mm in diameter; octahedral and dodecahedral, with lesser cubic and minor macle forms. The diamonds are further subdivided into those with abraded and non-abraded surfaces. Abraded diamonds show various colors in cathodoluminescence, whereas most non-abraded diamonds appear blue. In all populations, diamonds are predominantly colorless, with lesser brown to yellow and very rare white. Diamonds are predominantly Type IaAB and preserve moderate nitrogen aggregation and total nitrogen concentrations ranging from trace to ~1971 ppm. The kinetics of nitrogen aggregation indicate mantle-derived residence temperatures of 1124 ± 100 °C, assuming residence times of 1.3 and 2.6 Ga for abraded and non-abraded diamonds, respectively. The diamonds are largely sourced from the peridotitic to eclogitic lithospheric upper mantle based on both δ13C values of –5.82 ± 2.45‰ (VPDB-LSVEC) and inclusion suites predominantly comprised of forsterite, enstatite, Cr-pyrope, chromite, rutile, clinopyroxene, coesite, and almandine garnet. Detrital, accessory minerals are non-kimberlitic. Detrital zircon geochronology indicates diamondiferous deposits are predominantly sourced from Paleoproterozoic rocks of 2079 ± 88 Ma.


2019 ◽  
Vol 64 (9) ◽  
pp. 958-966
Author(s):  
G. Yu. Kriulina ◽  
A. V. Iskrina ◽  
D. A. Zedgenizov ◽  
A. V. Bobrov ◽  
V. K. Garanin
Keyword(s):  

The data on the composition of microinclusions in diamonds from the Lomonosov deposit are reported. The studied diamonds include coated (n = 5) and cubic (n = 5) crystals. The determined range of the degree of nitrogen aggregation (4-39 %B1) in diamonds does not support their links with kimberlite magmatism, but their short occurrence in the mantle at higher temperatures is probable as well. The composition of melt/fluid microinclusions in these samples varies from essentially carbonatitic to significantly silicate. It is shown that the content of MgO, CaO, Na2O, Cl and P2O5 decreases with increasing content of silicates and water. Different mechanisms of generation and evolution of diamond-forming media are considered to explain the observed variations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document