prereferral interventions
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

14
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

8
(FIVE YEARS 0)

1996 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 217-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cecil D. Mercer ◽  
LuAnn Jordan ◽  
David H. Allsopp ◽  
Ann R. Mercer

This article reports the results of a survey of the 51 state departments of education (including Washington, DC) regarding their definitions of learning disabilities, identification criteria, and operationalization procedures. A conceptual framework consisting of eight components was used in analyzing the definitions and identification criteria. Results show the continued effect of the 1977 federal definition and criteria while revealing variations in state definitions and criteria. For example, several state definitions now include the neurological component, and use of discrepancy criteria is increasing. To determine current trends, the data are compared with those from a similar survey published in 1990. Findings are discussed in terms of trends, prereferral interventions, and noncategorical identification.


1996 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald L. MacMillan ◽  
Frank M. Gresham ◽  
Maria F. Lopez ◽  
Kathleen M. Bocian

1994 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristi R. Flugum ◽  
Daniel J. Reschly

1992 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 34-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Ron Nelson ◽  
Deborah J. Smith ◽  
Lonnie Taylor ◽  
John M. Dodd ◽  
Ken Reavis

1989 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 217-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marleen C. Pugach ◽  
Lawrence J. Johnson

Special education has supported the implementation and study of a variety of prereferral interventions as a means of reducing the number of inappropriate formal referrals, especially in the field of learning disabilities. Programs of preservice teacher education are beginning to reflect the practice of prereferral activity programmatically by including preparation for teaming and consultation roles. In this article, the assumptions associated with the most prominent categories of prereferral interventions being adopted—consultation and informal problem-solving teams—are examined. A critical analysis of the benefits and limitations of each approach is offered, and alternative conceptions of prereferral practice are then presented.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document