opponent process theory
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

51
(FIVE YEARS 3)

H-INDEX

13
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clark Xu

If the opponent-process theory remains the best explanation for the pursuit of exercise, then practicing exercise routines is crucial to developing an active lifestyle. An individual seeking to make the transition from a sedentary to an active lifestyle should keep in mind that the emotional benefits of exercise will increase over time. Once established, exercise routines are self-perpetuating, as long as the individual follows the same routine. A different routine, however, will eliminate the relief stimuli and reset the opponent process, threatening recently active individuals with the risk of relapse.


2020 ◽  
Vol Volume 13 ◽  
pp. 1335-1347
Author(s):  
Nathalie Bitar ◽  
Jules Roger Dugré ◽  
Serge Marchand ◽  
Stéphane Potvin

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathalie Bitar ◽  
Serge Marchand ◽  
Stéphane Potvin

Background. Inhibitory conditioned pain modulation (ICPM) is one of the principal endogenous pain inhibition mechanisms and is triggered by strong nociceptive stimuli. Recently, it has been shown that feelings of pleasantness are experienced after the interruption of noxious stimuli. Given that pleasant stimuli have analgesic effects, it is therefore possible that the ICPM effect is explained by the confounding effect of pleasant pain relief. The current study sought to verify this assumption. Methods. Twenty-seven healthy volunteers were recruited. Thermal pain thresholds were measured using a Peltier thermode. ICPM was then measured by administering a tonic thermal stimulus before and after a cold-pressor test (CPT). Following the readministration of the CPT, pleasant pain relief was measured for 4 minutes. According to the opponent process theory, pleasant relief should be elicited following the interruption of a noxious stimulus. Results. The interruption of the CPT induced a mean and peak pleasant pain relief of almost 40% and 70%, respectively. Pleasant pain relief did not correlate with ICPM amplitude but was positively correlated with pain level during the CPT. Finally, a negative correlation was observed between pleasant pain relief and anxiety. Discussion. Results show that the cessation of a strong nociceptive stimulus elicits potent pleasant pain relief. The lack of correlation between ICPM and pleasant pain relief suggests that the ICPM effect, as measured by sequential paradigms, is unlikely to be fully explained by a pleasant pain relief phenomenon.


2017 ◽  
pp. 47-62
Author(s):  
Robert A. Rosellini ◽  
Robin L. Lashley

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 486-490
Author(s):  
Nathan A. Bowling ◽  
Terry A. Beehr

We read the focal article by Britt, Shen, Sinclair, Grossman, and Klieger (2016) with special interest. About 10 years ago, we were asked to write a chapter on hardiness (Beehr & Bowling, 2005), and in doing so we had many observations about hardiness that were similar to Britt et al.’s observations about resilience. Our chapter was most closely aligned with the “capacity” concept of resilience, but we think that both the “capacity” approach and the “demonstration” approach to resilience have merit.


2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 333-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R. Hollenbeck ◽  
D. Scott DeRue ◽  
Jennifer D. Nahrgang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document