implicit solvent models
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

82
(FIVE YEARS 12)

H-INDEX

28
(FIVE YEARS 6)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Lang ◽  
Emily Baker ◽  
Derek Woolfson ◽  
Adrian Mulholland

We test a range of standard implicit solvent models and protein forcefields for a set of 5 experimentally characterized, designed α-helical peptides. 65 combinations of forcefield and implicit solvent models are evaluated in >800 µs of molecular dynamics simulations. The data show that implicit solvent models generally fail to reproduce the experimentally observed secondary structure content, and none performs well for all 5 peptides. The results show that these models are not usefully predictive.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. 4755-4755
Author(s):  
Gabriel Bramley ◽  
Manh-Thuong Nguyen ◽  
Vassiliki-Alexandra Glezakou ◽  
Roger Rousseau ◽  
Chris-Kriton Skylaris

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 2703-2715 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Bramley ◽  
Manh-Thuong Nguyen ◽  
Vassiliki-Alexandra Glezakou ◽  
Roger Rousseau ◽  
Chris-Kriton Skylaris

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (42) ◽  
pp. 7555-7580 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir B. Sulimov ◽  
Danil C. Kutov ◽  
Alexey V. Sulimov

Background: Design of small molecules which are able to bind to the protein responsible for a disease is the key step of the entire process of the new medicine discovery. Atomistic computer modeling can significantly improve effectiveness of such design. The accurate calculation of the free energy of binding a small molecule (a ligand) to the target protein is the most important problem of such modeling. Docking is one of the most popular molecular modeling methods for finding ligand binding poses in the target protein and calculating the protein-ligand binding energy. This energy is used for finding the most active compounds for the given target protein. This short review aims to give a concise description of distinctive features of docking programs focusing on computation methods and approximations influencing their accuracy. Methods: This review is based on the peer-reviewed research literature including author’s own publications. The main features of several representative docking programs are briefly described focusing on their characteristics influencing docking accuracy: force fields, energy calculations, solvent models, algorithms of the best ligand pose search, global and local optimizations, ligand and target protein flexibility, and the simplifications made for the docking accelerating. Apart from other recent reviews focused mainly on the performance of different docking programs, in this work, an attempt is made to extract the most important functional characteristics defining the docking accuracy. Also a roadmap for increasing the docking accuracy is proposed. This is based on the new generation of docking programs which have been realized recently. These programs and respective new global optimization algorithms are described shortly. Results: Several popular conventional docking programs are considered. Their search of the best ligand pose is based explicitly or implicitly on the global optimization problem. Several algorithms are used to solve this problem, and among them, the heuristic genetic algorithm is distinguished by its popularity and an elaborate design. All conventional docking programs for their acceleration use the preliminary calculated grids of protein-ligand interaction potentials or preferable points of protein and ligand conjugation. These approaches and commonly used fitting parameters restrict strongly the docking accuracy. Solvent is considered in exceedingly simplified approaches in the course of the global optimization and the search for the best ligand poses. More accurate approaches on the base of implicit solvent models are used frequently for more careful binding energy calculations after docking. The new generation of docking programs are developed recently. They find the spectrum of low energy minima of a protein-ligand complex including the global minimum. These programs should be more accurate because they do not use a preliminary calculated grid of protein-ligand interaction potentials and other simplifications, the energy of any conformation of the molecular system is calculated in the frame of a given force field and there are no fitting parameters. A new docking algorithm is developed and fulfilled specially for the new docking programs. This algorithm allows docking a flexible ligand into a flexible protein with several dozen mobile atoms on the base of the global energy minimum search. Such docking results in improving the accuracy of ligand positioning in the docking process. The adequate choice of the method of molecular energy calculations also results in the better docking positioning accuracy. An advancement in the application of quantum chemistry methods to docking and scoring is revealed. Conclusion: The findings of this review confirm the great demand in docking programs for discovery of new medicine substances with the help of molecular modeling. New trends in docking programs design are revealed. These trends are focused on the increase of the docking accuracy at the expense of more accurate molecular energy calculations without any fitting parameters, including quantum-chemical methods and implicit solvent models, and by using new global optimization algorithms which make it possible to treat flexibility of ligands and mobility of protein atoms simultaneously. Finally, it is shown that all the necessary prerequisites for increasing the docking accuracy can be accomplished in practice.


2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (3) ◽  
pp. 1293-1302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ang Gao ◽  
Richard C. Remsing ◽  
John D. Weeks

Coulomb interactions play a major role in determining the thermodynamics, structure, and dynamics of condensed-phase systems, but often present significant challenges. Computer simulations usually use periodic boundary conditions to minimize corrections from finite cell boundaries but the long range of the Coulomb interactions generates significant contributions from distant periodic images of the simulation cell, usually calculated by Ewald sum techniques. This can add significant overhead to computer simulations and hampers the development of intuitive local pictures and simple analytic theory. In this paper, we present a general framework based on local molecular field theory to accurately determine the contributions from long-ranged Coulomb interactions to the potential of mean force between ionic or apolar hydrophobic solutes in dilute aqueous solutions described by standard classical point charge water models. The simplest approximation leads to a short solvent (SS) model, with truncated solvent–solvent and solute–solvent Coulomb interactions and long-ranged but screened Coulomb interactions only between charged solutes. The SS model accurately describes the interplay between strong short-ranged solute core interactions, local hydrogen-bond configurations, and long-ranged dielectric screening of distant charges, competing effects that are difficult to capture in standard implicit solvent models.


2020 ◽  
Vol 73 (8) ◽  
pp. 677
Author(s):  
Ying Min Wu ◽  
Yuvixza Lizarme Salas ◽  
Yun Cheuk Leung ◽  
Luke Hunter ◽  
Junming Ho

In this paper, a dataset of 11 fluorinated compounds containing a variety of functional groups (amides, esters, indoles, and ethers) as well as mono, gem-difluoro, erythro-difluoro, and threo-difluoro patterns were synthesised and their octanol–water partition coefficients (log P) were measured using a shake-flask method. The resulting data was used to assess the performance of several popular empirical fragment-based methods as well as quantum chemical implicit solvent models (SMD and SM12). Overall, the empirical miLOGP, ALOGPS, and ALOGP methods performed the best with a mean absolute deviation (MAD) of ~0.25 log units, while the best performing implicit solvent model SMD has a slightly higher MAD of 0.36 log units. Based on the present work and previous studies, the miLOGP and ALOGP empirical methods are recommended for fast and moderately accurate prediction of log P for neutral organic solutes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
pp. 40-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
David C. Malaspina ◽  
Leonor Pérez-Fuentes ◽  
Carlos Drummond ◽  
Delfi Bastos-González ◽  
Jordi Faraudo

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document