asian indian americans
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

11
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 705-723 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kavita Radhakrishnan ◽  
Lauren Jodi Van Scoy ◽  
Regina Jillapalli ◽  
Shubhada Saxena ◽  
Miyong T. Kim

2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 294-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kavita Radhakrishnan ◽  
Shubhada Saxena ◽  
Regina Jillapalli ◽  
Yuri Jang ◽  
Miyong Kim

2008 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 45-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Poorni Otilingam ◽  
Margaret Gatz

We surveyed a convenience sample of 255 Asian Indian Americans (AIAs) aged 18-81 years assessing perceptions of dementia etiology, help-seeking, and treatment, and knowledge of symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). In response to a vignette describing the early stages of AD, participants indicated a substantial willingness to seek help. Most participants knew that memory loss was the key symptom of dementia, yet most knowledge items were correctly answered by fewer than half of the sample. Participants who had more knowledge of AD were more likely than those with less knowledge of AD to state that they would seek help for an elderly relative showing symptoms of dementia. Relative to other psychosocial factors, loneliness was highly rated as an etiological factor and keeping mentally active was highly rated as a treatment. This study is the first to document dementia beliefs among AIAs, illustrating the need for culturally-tailored dementia education and care for the AIA population.


2007 ◽  
Vol 97 (3) ◽  
pp. 215-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.R. Alexander ◽  
M.S. Wingate ◽  
J. Mor ◽  
S. Boulet

1998 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marilyn Fernandez

Using the 1990 5% PUMS census data, this paper explores the glass ceiling experiences of college educated Asian Indian Americans in the Bay Area. Theoretical assumptions derived from human capital, assimilation, labor market structures, size discrimination, and cost of race perspectives are used to predict glass ceiling experiences. Separate analyses are conducted for males and females. U.S. born white males and females are used as benchmarks in the male and female models respectively. As predicted by the cost of race assumption, educated Asian Indian American males experience a net disadvantage in rising to management levels. The relative success of immigrant white males in management provides additional support for the cost of race assumption. Once Asian Indian males become managers, their economic returns are better than or commensurate with that of comparable white male managers in some sectors but not in others. Immigrant and U.S. born Asian Indian females face the glass ceiling at both levels: they are disadvantaged in becoming managers and earn less than comparable U.S. born white females once they become managers. There is no conclusive evidence to support the size discrimination hypothesis for males and females. The glass ceiling findings are interpreted using qualitative interview data from Asian Indian Americans in the Bay Area.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document