division i football
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

136
(FIVE YEARS 40)

H-INDEX

15
(FIVE YEARS 2)

Author(s):  
Martha Serena Archer ◽  
Tony Weaver

This research explores the socialization of NCAA Division I student-athletes through case study research methods to understand the influence of collegiate sport on interactions across intersectional identities. Grounded in academic theories relation to student-athlete socialization and intersectionality, this study addresses the following overarching question: What is the influence of athletic participation on the socialization of student-athletes? Interviews lasting 30-45 minutes were conducted with student-athletes (n=21) and athletic staff (n=4) associated with an NCAA Division I football program at a predominantly White institution (PWI) in the southern United States. Results suggested that the socialization of student athletes is complicated by their diverse, intersectional identities and oftentimes requires them to fall into perceived situational identities depending on the social setting.


Author(s):  
Kurt McDowell

Body composition and power are impactful variables of athletic performance. However, few studies have assessed power and body composition changes from pre-, to mid-, to end-of-season in American Football linebackers. The purpose of this study was to determine how power and body composition respond to a competitive season in Division I Football Championship Series (FCS) American football linebackers. Participants (n=9; Age=19.7 ± 1.5 years; Weight=101.5±11.6 kg; Height=183.3±5.2 cm; [Body Fat percent (BF %) =21.31 ± 6.02%)] performed a Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scan, and power was assessed via three vertical jumps and squat jumps at 40, 60, 80, and 100 kg at three time points: a) 1 week prior to their regular season, b) 2 days after the bye week in the middle of the season, and c) 1 week prior to the completion of the season. An Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) revealed no significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) in power or body composition. These results support past research, indicating power and body composition can be maintained throughout a competitive season. However, more research is needed to determine the optimal programming methods to maintain or improve athletic performance via optimization of body composition and power during a competitive season.


2021 ◽  
Vol 53 (8S) ◽  
pp. 40-40
Author(s):  
Amanda N. Gordon ◽  
Malia N.M Blue ◽  
Hannah E. Cabre ◽  
Lacey M. Gould ◽  
Katie R. Hirsch ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Marcel Lopes dos Santos ◽  
James Bryan Mann ◽  
Robert George Lockie ◽  
Ricardo Berton ◽  
Bert Hans Jacobson ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: Bar velocity has been proved to accurately predict performance in several exercises. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the total number of repetitions during the NFL-225 Bench Press Test (NFL-225) based on bar velocity in collegiate football players. METHODS: Forty-six NCAA Division I football players performed as many bench press repetitions as possible with a standard load of 225 lbs. The variables used to estimate the total number of repetitions were: mean velocity of the fastest repetition achieved in the test (FR); mean velocity of the first repetition (V1); mean velocity of the first three repetitions (MV3); mean velocity of the first five repetitions (MV5); and mean velocity of the first 10 repetitions (MV10). Linear regression analyses were conducted to predict NFL-225 performance based on bar velocity. RESULTS: The prediction of the total number of repetitions was similar between the five mean velocities (FR: R2= 0.64, SEE = 3.87, V1: R2= 0.65, SEE = 3.80, MV3: R2= 0.70, SEE = 3.52, MV5: R2= 0.71, SEE = 3.48, and MV10: R2= 0.62, SEE = 3.37). CONCLUSION: The mean velocities allowed the production of general regression equations for the estimation of the total number of repetitions in the NFL-225. V1 and MV3 presented as the best options due to their accuracy, time-efficiency, and reduced musculoskeletal stress.


2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 123-146
Author(s):  
Jessica R. Murfree ◽  
Anita M. Moorman

In recent years, extreme weather events, namely hurricanes, have compromised the college football schedule in the United States. Incidents of extreme weather have caused the cancellation, postponement, relocation, or otherwise alteration of dozens of Division I college football games in recent years. Focusing primarily on hurricanes, this study will present several concerns related to these storms and extreme weather in the US, and contractual law principles of common law defenses and force majeure clauses as they relate to college football game contracts. The purpose of the present study is to begin to better understand the football game contract inconsistencies that can lead to legal disputes faced by college football programs that deal with these storms, and gain a better insight of the contractual considerations made in light of these storms that are becoming increasinglyfrequent and severe. To do so, college football game contracts were obtained through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests to select NCAA Division I colleges, internet-based searches, and media exchanges. Analysis of force majeure contract language revealed inconsistent definitions of force majeure events, a limited number of contracts containing specific weather-related force majeure language, and a range of force majeure events leading to the absence of a clear and consistent understanding of how extreme weather-related cancellations would impact the contractual relationships. Recommendations, asa result of the document analysis, are then made for provisionary revision and reconstruction to meet current realistic needs for individual schools. Societal consciousness regarding climate change is adjusting, therefore sport and legal practitioners can reflect this modernization by scrutinizing potential prudent risks.


2021 ◽  
pp. 107110072097875
Author(s):  
Eric W. Tan ◽  
Ioanna K. Bolia ◽  
Alexander B. Peterson ◽  
Shane Korber ◽  
Russ Romano ◽  
...  

Level of Evidence: Level V.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document