ultradwarf bermudagrass
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

24
(FIVE YEARS 10)

H-INDEX

4
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cameron Stephens ◽  
Travis W Gannon ◽  
Marc Cubeta ◽  
Tim L. Sit ◽  
Jim Kerns

Take-all root rot is a disease of ultradwarf bermudagrass putting greens caused by Gaeumannomyces graminis (Gg), Gaeumannomyces sp. (Gx), Gaeumannomyces graminicola (Ggram), Candidacolonium cynodontis (Cc), and Magnaporthiopsis cynodontis (Mc). Many etiological and epidemiological components of this disease remain unknown. Improving pathogen identification and our understanding of the aggressiveness of these pathogens along with growth at different temperatures will advance our knowledge of disease development to optimize management strategies. Take-all root rot pathogens were isolated from symptomatic bermudagrass root and stolon pieces from 16 different golf courses. Isolates of Gg, Gx, Ggram, Cc, and Mc were used to inoculate ‘Champion’ bermudagrass in an in planta aggressiveness assay. Each pathogen was also evaluated at 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, and 35C to determine growth temperature optima. Infected plant tissue was used to develop a real-time PCR high resolution melt assay for pathogen detection. This assay was able to differentiate each pathogen directly from infected plant tissue using a single primer pair. In general, Ggram, Gg, and Gx were the most aggressive while Cc and Mc exhibited moderate aggressiveness. Pathogens were more aggressive when incubated at 30C compared to 20C. While they grew optimally between 24.4 and 27.8C, pathogens exhibited limited growth at 35C and no growth at 10C. These data provide important information on this disease and its causal agents that may improve take-all root rot management.


Mycologia ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Phillip L. Vines ◽  
Federico G. Hoffmann ◽  
Florencia Meyer ◽  
Thomas W. Allen ◽  
Maria Tomaso-Peterson

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qing Xia ◽  
Thomas Rufty ◽  
Wei Shi

Microbes can colonize plant roots to modulate plant health and environmental fitness. Thus, using microbes to improve plant adaptation to biotic and abiotic stresses will be promising to abate the heavy reliance of management systems on synthetic chemicals and limited resource. This is particularly important for turfgrass systems because intensive management for plant available nutrients (e.g., nitrogen), water, and pest control is necessary to maintain a healthy and aesthetic landscape. However, little is known on microbial species and host compatibility in turfgrass root endosphere and rhizosphere. Here, by using marker gene high throughput sequencing approaches we demonstrated that a few bacterial and fungal species prevailed the root endosphere and rhizosphere and were of a broad host spectrum. Irrespective of turfgrass species (bermudagrass, ultradwarf bermudagrass, creeping bentgrass, and tall fescue), defoliation intensities (i.e., mowing height and frequency), turfgrass sites, and sampling time, Pseudomonas veronii was predominant in the root endosphere, constituting ∼38% of the total bacterial community, which was much higher than its presence in the bulk soil (∼0.5%) and rhizosphere (∼4.6%). By contrast, Janthinobacterium lividum and fungal species of the genus Pseudogymnoascus were more abundant in the rhizosphere, constituting ∼15 and ∼ 39% of the total bacterial and fungal community, respectively, compared to their respective presence in the bulk soil (∼ 0.1 and 5%) and root endosphere (∼ 0.8 and 0.3%). Such stark contrasts in the microbiome composition between the root endosphere, rhizosphere, and bulk soil were little influenced by turfgrass species, suggesting the broad turfgrass host compatibility of these bacterial and fungal species. Further, their dominance in respective niches were mutually unaffected, implying the possibility of developing a multiple species formula for coping turfgrass with environmental stresses. These species were likely involved in controlling pests, such as infectious nematodes and fungi, decomposing root debris, and helping turfgrass water and nutrient uptake; yet these possibilities need to be further examined.


itsrj ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. A. Dant ◽  
S. B. Martin ◽  
J. P. Kerns ◽  
L. B. McCarty

Crop Science ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Austin M. Brown ◽  
James R. Harris ◽  
Clebson G. Gonçalves ◽  
John M. Peppers ◽  
Simone Magni ◽  
...  

Crop Science ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Austin M. Brown ◽  
James R. Harris ◽  
Clebson G. Gonçalves ◽  
John M. Peppers ◽  
Simone Magni ◽  
...  

cftm ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric J. DeBoer ◽  
Douglas E. Karcher ◽  
John H. McCalla ◽  
Michael D. Richardson

cftm ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 190019
Author(s):  
Eric J. DeBoer ◽  
Michael D. Richardson ◽  
John H. McCalla ◽  
Douglas E. Karcher

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document