blueback herring
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

78
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

16
(FIVE YEARS 0)



Author(s):  
Foivos A. Mouchlianitis ◽  
Eric T. Schultz ◽  
Thassya C. Santos Schmidt ◽  
Justin P. Davis ◽  
Kostas Ganias




2020 ◽  
Vol 103 (10) ◽  
pp. 1179-1195
Author(s):  
Samantha B. Alexander ◽  
CJ Carroll Schlick ◽  
Kim de Mutsert


Author(s):  
Theodore Castro-Santos ◽  
Kevin B. Mulligan ◽  
Micah Kieffer ◽  
Alexander J. Haro
Keyword(s):  


2020 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
pp. 741-751 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven M. Lombardo ◽  
Jeffrey A. Buckel ◽  
Ernie F. Hain ◽  
Emily H. Griffith ◽  
Holly White

We analyzed four decades of presence–absence data from a fishery-independent survey to characterize the long-term phenology of river herring (alewife, Alosa pseudoharengus; and blueback herring, Alosa aestivalis) spawning migrations in their southern distribution. We used logistic generalized additive models to characterize the average ingress, peak, and egress timing of spawning. In the 2010s, alewife arrived to spawning habitat 16 days earlier and egressed 27 days earlier (peak 12 days earlier) relative to the 1970s. Blueback herring arrived 5 days earlier and egressed 23 days earlier (peak 13 days earlier) in the 2010s relative to the 1980s. The changes in ingress and egress timing have shortened the occurrence in spawning systems by 11 days for alewife over four decades and 18 days for blueback herring over three decades. We found that the rate of vernal warming was faster during 2001–2016 relative to 1973–1988 and is the most parsimonious explanation for changes in spawning phenology. The influence of a shortened spawning season on river herring population dynamics warrants further investigation.



2019 ◽  
Vol 146 ◽  
pp. 935-939 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Gray Ryan ◽  
Lisa Watkins ◽  
M. Todd Walter




2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather K. Evans ◽  
Kara B. Carlson ◽  
Russ Wisser ◽  
Morgan E. Raley ◽  
Katy M. Potoka ◽  
...  

Abstract Blueback Herring Alosa aestivalis populations throughout the East Coast have declined precipitously since the late 1980s and were listed as a Species of Concern in 2006 by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Natural resource agencies are attempting to restore this species to viable and sustainable levels with fry stockings cultured in hatcheries. To evaluate the long-term contribution of stockings to populations, agencies need an accurate method to track these stocking efforts. Genetic parentage-based tagging is recognized as a feasible means of assessing hatchery contribution of stocked fish to rivers of interest. However, Blueback Herring lack a reliable set of genetic markers to conduct parentage-based tagging. To this end, we analyzed previously described microsatellites as well as new microsatellite markers identified through NextGeneration sequencing to create a suite of 14 Blueback Herring markers useful for parentage-based tagging. The markers were successful in parentage analysis for Blueback Herring collected from the Chowan River, North Carolina. An additional challenge in the management of Blueback Herring is the ability to phenotypically distinguish Blueback Herring from the closely related Alewife Alosa pseudoharengus. Furthermore, recent studies provide evidence that these two species, collectively referred to as river herring, may be hybridizing with one another in some systems. Microsatellite marker AsaC334 can be utilized to discriminate between the two species, as well as to identify their F1 hybrids, thereby providing another genetic tool for hatchery management.



2016 ◽  
Vol 73 (6) ◽  
pp. 951-963 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Hasselman ◽  
Eric C. Anderson ◽  
Emily E. Argo ◽  
N. David Bethoney ◽  
Stephen R. Gephard ◽  
...  

Bycatch of mid-trophic-level anadromous fishes that connect marine and freshwater ecosystems is a growing conservation concern. Anadromous alewife (Alosa pseudoharengus) and blueback herring (Alosa aestivalis) are important components of coastal freshwater and marine food webs, but have experienced dramatic declines in the abundances of spawning adults. Freshwater-focused restoration efforts have yielded few consistent signs of recovery, raising concerns that bycatch in Northwest Atlantic commercial fisheries may be negating these conservation actions. Using data from 15 microsatellites genotyped for baseline populations and bycatch, we conducted genetic stock identification to understand how bycatch was partitioned among previously identified regional genetic stocks. We then combined this information with fishery observer data to estimate genetic stock-specific bycatch mortality for the southern New England Atlantic herring fishery (2012–2013). Bycatch overall, but especially in the Atlantic herring fishery, was disproportionately assigned to the most severely depleted genetic stocks (alewife southern New England stock — 70% of assignments; blueback herring mid-Atlantic stock — 78% of assignments). These genetic stocks overlap in the region surrounding Long Island Sound, suggesting that bycatch taken from this area in recent years may be negatively impacting recovery efforts in this region. Our study suggests that mitigating bycatch on the southern New England fishing grounds may benefit recovery efforts for alewife and blueback herring genetic stocks that have experienced the greatest declines in spawning adult abundances.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document