lens regeneration
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

210
(FIVE YEARS 9)

H-INDEX

34
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
pp. 108808
Author(s):  
Weiju Wu ◽  
Noemi Lois ◽  
Alan R. Prescott ◽  
Adrian P. Brown ◽  
Veerle Van Gerwen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 4
Author(s):  
Weihao Chen ◽  
Georgios Tsissios ◽  
Anthony Sallese ◽  
Byran Smucker ◽  
Anh-Thu Nguyen ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Weihao Chen ◽  
Georgios Tsissios ◽  
Anthony Sallese ◽  
Byran Smucker ◽  
Anh Thu Nguyen ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (22) ◽  
pp. 1544-1544
Author(s):  
Zhenzhen Liu ◽  
Ruixin Wang ◽  
Haotian Lin ◽  
Yizhi Liu
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. e000459
Author(s):  
Xiaoting Ruan ◽  
Zhenzhen Liu ◽  
Lixia Luo ◽  
Yizhi Liu

In humans, the lens is the organ with the ability to change morphology and refractive power, designated as accommodation, to focus light from various distances and obtain clear retinal image. The accommodative ability of the lens depends on its structure and biological parameters. The lens grows throughout the life, forming specific lens sutures and a unique gradient refractive index, and possesses regenerative ability under certain circumstances. Minimally invasive lens surgery that preserves endogenous lens epithelial stem/progenitor cells (LECs) can achieve functional lens regeneration in humans. The lens is the main source of intraocular aberration, especially intraocular higher-order aberrations (IHOAs) which is found to be binocularly symmetrical in phakic eyes. There is a compensation mechanism between corneal aberrations and lens aberrations. Therefore, the structure and the biological parameters of the lens, the binocular relationship of the lens and the correlation between the lens and cornea affect visual quality. This paper summarises the above findings and their current and potential applications in refractive surgeries, providing a comprehensive understanding of the lens as a strong determinant of visual quality in the optical system.


2019 ◽  
Vol 307 ◽  
pp. 58-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonid M. Zukin ◽  
Michelle G. Pedler ◽  
Kevin Chyung ◽  
Sarah Seiwald ◽  
Patricia Lenhart ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alvin G Thomas ◽  
Mohd Tayyab Adil ◽  
Jonathan J Henry

AbstractPURPOSEXenopus has the remarkable ability to regenerate a lens from the basal cornea epithelial cells in response to signals from the retina. Previous work demonstrated that the Retinoic Acid (RA) metabolizing enzyme CYP26 is expressed in the cornea, and that its activity is required for lens regeneration. Gaps remain in our knowledge as to whether CYP26 is needed only to attenuate RA signaling via RA elimination, or whether it also acts to generate retinoid metabolites, such as 4-oxo-RA, to act as signaling ligands. Other key questions are why CYP26 antagonism, but not exogenous retinoids, can reduce cell division in the cornea, and when during regeneration CYP26 is important.MATERIALS AND METHODSEx vivo cultures supplemented with RA, 4-oxo-RA, or the CYP26 inhibitor Liarozole were used to assay the effects of these compounds on lens regeneration. Similarly, corneas were explanted, cultured in the presence of these compounds, and assayed for mitotic changes by counting anti-Histone H3 positive nuclei. qPCRs validated responsiveness to these compounds.RESULTSEx vivo cultures showed that when the media was supplemented with the RA metabolite 4-oxo-RA in addition to Liarozole, lens regeneration was still inhibited. 4-oxo-RA also does not rescue the loss of cell division in the cornea that is observed upon CYP26 antagonism. Liarozole inhibited regeneration when added 12 hours after lentectomy, but not when added 48 hours after.CONCLUSIONSThese data show that the necessity of CYP26 is not explained as a generator of 4-oxo-RA for regeneration. Moreover, Liarozole-induced mitotic reduction is not explained by 4-oxo-RA deficiency. These results support a model of RA-independent mitotic regulation by CYP26, though other retinoid metabolites may be active. Finally, CYP26 activity is only needed between 12 and 48 hours post-surgery, showing that its action is required only during the earliest stages of lens regeneration.Financial interestsThe authors declare no competing financial interests.


2019 ◽  
Vol 248 (7) ◽  
pp. 530-544
Author(s):  
Kimberly J. Perry ◽  
Paul W. Hamilton ◽  
Surabhi Sonam ◽  
Ratnakar Singh ◽  
Jonathan J. Henry

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Moore ◽  
Kimberly J. Perry ◽  
Cindy Sun ◽  
Jonathan J. Henry

AbstractBackgroundThe frog Xenopus laevis has notable regenerative capabilities, including that of the lens. The neural retina provides the factors that trigger lens regeneration from the cornea, but the identity of these factors is largely unknown. In contrast to the cornea, fibroblast growth factors FGF1, 8, and 9 are highly expressed within the retina, and are potential candidates for those factors. The purpose of this study is to determine whether specific FGF proteins can induce lens formation, and if perturbation of FGFR signaling inhibits lens regeneration.MethodsA novel cornea epithelial culture method was developed to investigate the sufficiency of FGFs in lens regeneration. Additionally, transgenic larvae expressing dominant negative FGFR1 were used to investigate the necessity of FGFR signaling in lens regeneration.ResultsTreatment of cultured corneas with FGF1 induced lens regeneration in a dose-dependent manner, whereas treatment with FGF2, FGF8, or FGF9 did not result in significant lens regeneration. Inhibition of FGFR signaling decreased the lens regeneration rate for in vitro eye cultures.ConclusionThe culture techniques developed here, and elsewhere, have provided reliable methods for examining the necessity of various factors that may be involved in lens regeneration. Based on the results demonstrated in this study, we found that FGF1 signaling and FGFR activation are key factors for lens regeneration in Xenopus.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document