subsistence fisheries
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

40
(FIVE YEARS 9)

H-INDEX

11
(FIVE YEARS 2)

Foods ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 2621
Author(s):  
Iris Koch ◽  
Pranab Das ◽  
Bronte E. McPhedran ◽  
John M. Casselman ◽  
Kristy L. Moniz ◽  
...  

As mercury emissions continue and climate-mediated permafrost thaw increases the burden of this contaminant in northern waters, Inuit from a Northwest passage community in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago pressed for an assessment of their subsistence catches. Sea-run salmonids (n = 537) comprising Arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus), lake trout (S. namaycush), lake whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis), and cisco (C. autumnalis, C. sardinella) were analyzed for muscle mercury. Methylmercury is a neurotoxin and bioaccumulated with fish age, but other factors including selenium and other elements, diet and trophic level as assessed by stable isotopes of nitrogen (δ15N) and carbon (δ13C), as well as growth rate, condition, and geographic origin, also contributed depending on the species, even though all the fish shared a similar anadromous or sea-run life history. Although mean mercury concentrations for most of the species were ~0.09 µg·g−1 wet weight (ww), below the levels described in several jurisdictions for subsistence fisheries (0.2 µg·g−1 ww), 70% of lake trout were above this guideline (0.35 µg·g−1 ww), and 19% exceeded the 2.5-fold higher levels for commercial sale. We thus urge the development of consumption advisories for lake trout for the protection of pregnant women and young children and that additionally, periodic community-based monitoring be initiated.


Author(s):  
Caleb Gardner ◽  
Reginald A. Watson ◽  
Anes Dwi Jayanti ◽  
Suadi ◽  
Mohsen AlHusaini ◽  
...  

Much of the biological and other research efforts on crustaceans have been driven by their importance to humans as a food source. Production comes from a diverse array of methods and scales of extraction, from small recreational or subsistence fisheries to industrial-scale operations. Most crustacean catch comes from shrimp fisheries, with over two million tons taken in 2014, mainly by trawl. The genera Acetes, Fenneropenaeus, and Pandalus account for around three quarters of this catch. Crab, krill, and lobster are the other main crustacean products (around 600,000 t crab, 380,000 t krill, and 300,000 t lobster in 2014). Trends in crustacean fisheries are broadly similar to those of other seafood, although crustaceans often target different market segments and receive higher prices than fish. Crustacean fisheries management faces many challenges with management of bycatch from trawl gears especially significant. Fortunately, crustaceans tend to be easily handled with low discard mortality, and this has enabled widespread use of regulations based on size, maturity, or sex (e.g., male-only fisheries). Total allowable catch (TAC) limits are widely used and highly effective for ensuring sustainable harvests when set responsibly using good information. TAC systems are often combined with catch share or individual transferable quota systems, which had a mixed history in crustaceans, sometimes reducing overall community benefit. This parallels the challenge facing fisheries globally of ensuring that harvests are not only sustainable but also deliver benefits to the wider community beyond the commercial fishers; management of some crustacean fisheries is at the forefront of these developments.


2020 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
pp. 101438
Author(s):  
Eudriano F.S. Costa ◽  
Jeremias Mocuba ◽  
Daniel Oliveira ◽  
Maria Alexandra Teodósio ◽  
Francisco Leitão

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 459-475 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. HERBERT ◽  
J.B. JONES ◽  
C.V. MOHAN ◽  
R.P. PERERA

2019 ◽  
Vol 96 (5) ◽  
pp. 1142-1159
Author(s):  
Micheline Kasongo Ilunga ◽  
Emmanuel Abwe ◽  
Eva Decru ◽  
Auguste Chocha Manda ◽  
Emmanuel Vreven

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-91
Author(s):  
Gouri Mondal ◽  
Samapti Saha ◽  
Md Monirul Islam ◽  
Goutam Kumar Kundu ◽  
Bijoya Paul ◽  
...  

The Indian river shad, Gudusia chapra, locally known as chapila fish is rich in nutritive values and important to artisanal and subsistence fisheries in Bangladesh. The conservation status of this species is of particular interest due to its recent decline in rivers. To assess the current status of this species in Bangladesh, we recorded its abundance at seven sites in the Padma, the Meghna and the Tetulia rivers during pre-monsoon, monsoon and post-monsoon seasons. In this study, G. chapra was consistently recorded in the study area and there was no significant temporal or spatial variation in its abundance. The observed mean length and weight of the species were similar to those recorded in earlier studies. Currently, G. chapra is listed as vulnerable species in the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species in Bangladesh. Although the primary known habitat of this species is river, IUCN assessment was based on production from beel and Kaptai Lake habitats. In this study, consistent occurrence and availability of the species across spatial and temporal scales in rivers suggest the necessity to reassess the conservation status of G. chapra in the country. Dhaka Univ. J. Biol. Sci. 28(1): 83-91, 2019 (January)


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher J. Brown ◽  
Andrew Broadley ◽  
Fernanda Adame ◽  
Trevor A. Branch ◽  
Mischa Turschwell ◽  
...  

AbstractAt the crux of the debate over the global sustainability of fisheries is what society must do prevent overexploitation of fisheries and aid recovery of fisheries that have historically been overexploited. The focus of debates has been on controlling fishing pressure and assessments have not considered that stock production may be affected by changes in fish habitat. Fish habitats are being modified by climate change, built infrastructure, destructive fishing practices and pollution. We conceptualise how the classification of stock status can be biased by habitat change. Habitat loss can result in either overly optimistic or overly conservative assessment of stock status. The classification of stock status depends on how habitat affects fish demography and what reference points management uses to assess status. Nearly half of the 418 stocks in a global stock assessment database use seagrass, mangroves, coral reefs and macroalgae, habitats that have well documented trends. There is also considerable circumstantial evidence that habitat change has contributed to overexploitation or enhanced production of data-poor fisheries, like inland and subsistence fisheries. Globally many habitats are in decline, so the role of habitat should be considered when assessing the global status of fisheries. New methods and global databases of habitat trends, and use of habitats by fishery species are required to properly attribute the causes of decline in fisheries, and are likely to raise the profile of habitat protection as an important complementary aim for fisheries management.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document