Modified Canal Wall Down Mastoidectomy Without Meatoplasty

It is important to decide which procedure to employ between canal wall up mastoidectomy and canal wall down mastoidectomy (CWDM) as each procedure has its own advantages and disadvantages. To combine the advantages and compensate the disadvantages of each procedure, various methods and approaches have been devised. Mastoid and epitympanic obliteration, which minimizes the dead space in the mastoid cavity, was previously known to prevent the occurrence of retraction pockets. We performed mastoid and epitympanic obliteration also to prevent the occurrence of cavity problems without meatoplasty. Here we describe the surgical procedures for modified CWDM without meatoplasty and mastoid obliteration using autologous materials.

Wideband Absorbance in Ears with Retraction Pockets and Cholesteatomas: A Preliminary Study

Objectives The objective of this study was to describe wideband absorbance (WBA) findings in patients with cholesteatomas and retraction pockets (RPs). Design In this prospective study, tympanometry, audiometry, and wideband tympanometry (WBT) were performed on 27 ears with an RP (eight with epitympanic RP and 19 ears with mesotympanic RP), 39 ears with a cholesteatoma (23 ears with epitympanic and 16 ears with mesotympanic cholesteatomas [MCs]), and 49 healthy ears serving as controls. Results Mean WBA at ambient pressure (WBAamb) of both experimental groups was reduced significantly between 0.8 and 5 kHz relative to the control group. The difference between mean WBAamb and mean WBA at tympanometric peak pressure (WBATPP) was greater for the RP (0.12–0.16 between 0.5 and 1.5 kHz) than for the cholesteatoma group (0.03–0.11 between 0.6 and 3 kHz). Mean WBAamb of both epitympanic RP (ERP) and epitympanic cholesteatoma (EC) subgroups was significantly lower than that of the control group. Mean WBATPP of the ERP subgroup attained normal levels as per the control group, while mean WBATPP of EC subgroup was significantly lower than that of the control group at 0.8 to 1.5 kHz and 4 to 5 kHz. In contrast, both mesotympanic RP and MC subgroups demonstrated similar mean WBAamb and WBATPP values. No significant differences in WBAamb and WBATPP results between the RP and cholesteatomas groups were observed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses indicated that the area under the ROC curve for distinguishing between the RP and cholesteatomas groups ranged from 0.44 to 0.60, indicating low accuracy in separating the two groups. Conclusion While it is not possible to distinguish between the RP and cholesteatomas groups based on the WBAamb and WBATPP results, it is potentially feasible to differentiate between the EC and ERP conditions. Further study using a large clinical sample is recommended to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the WBA test to identify the EC and ERP conditions.

Subannular Tubes in Children With Cleft Palate

Objective: To investigate subannular tube (SAT) placement as an alternative treatment of chronic middle ear disease in children with cleft palate. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Participants: All children with cleft palate with intractable otitis media with effusion and/or with tympanic membrane retraction, operated for insertion of 1 or more sets of transtympanic tubes followed by SAT in a tertiary center. Main Outcome Measures: Audiological outcomes, average duration of tubes, and postoperative complications were analyzed. Results: This study included 21 children with cleft palate, aged 3 to 14 years. A total of 38 ears was evaluated. The median time of follow-up was 42 months. During follow-up, 69.2% of the patients had no complications. Observed complications were otorrhea (13.5%) and tube obstruction (7.7%). In 7.9% of the cases, otitis media with effusion relapsed after tube extrusion. By the end of the study, 76.3% of the tubes remained in situ and 68.4% of the tympanic membranes had the SAT in place and had no significant alterations. The mean duration of SATs was 16 months, which was significantly superior to transtympanic tube duration. A significant sustained improvement in the hearing of children with SATs was observed. Conclusion: Subannular tube insertion results in hearing improvement to normal range and tympanic retraction pockets reversion in children with cleft palate with persistent otitis media with effusion and tympanic retraction/atelectasis. This surgery appears to be safe and provides long-term efficient middle ear aeration. Strict postoperative follow-up is crucial for the success of the treatment.

Surgical Management of Retraction Pockets: Does Mastoidectomy have a Role?

Introduction Retraction pocket is a condition in which the eardrum lies deeper within the middle ear. Its management has no consensus in literature. Objective To assess the role of mastoidectomy in the management of retraction pockets added to a tympanoplasty. Methods Prospective study of patients with retraction pocket and referred to surgery. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups: one managed with tympanoplasty and mastoidectomy and the other group with tympanoplasty only. The minimum follow-up considered was 12 months. The outcomes were: integrity of eardrum, recurrence, and hearing status. Results This study included 43 patients. In 24 cases retraction occurred in the posterior half of the eardrum, and in 19 patients there was clinical evidence of ossicular interruption. The two groups of treatment were composed by: 21 patients that underwent tympanoplasty with mastoidectomy and 22 patients had only tympanoplasty. One case of the first group had a recurrence. In 32 cases patients follow up was longer than 48 months. The average air-bone gap changed from 22.1 dB to 5 dB. The percentage of air-bone gap improvement was assessed at 60% in those patients treated with mastoidectomy, and 64.3% in those without it (p > 0.5). Conclusion Tympanoplasty and ossiculoplasty should be considered to treat atelectatic middle ear and ossicular chain interruption. Mastoidectomy as a way to increase air volume in the ear seems to be a paradox; it does not add favorable prognostic factor to management of retraction pockets.

Comparison of graft uptake in patients undergoing myringoplasty/ tympanoplasty by overlay and underlay procedure.

Objectives: To determine which method underlay or overlay has higher results in graft uptake in Tympanoplasty. Study Design: It was experimental study. Setting: it was carried out at ENT Department of Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi. Period: One year from March 2017 to February 2018. Material and Methods: It consisted of a total of 27 patients presenting with chronic otitis media with dry perforation. Two groups of patients were made. Group A had 14 members who undergone underlay technique while the 13 patients in group B undergone overlay technique. Comparison was made on basis of successful graft uptake the main criteria of which was absence of lateralization, atelectasis, blunting or formation of retraction pockets by the end of 6 weeks of follow up. Result: Out of the 27 surgeries, 70.37% of the Myringoplasties were successful. The percent graft uptake came out to be 61.5% with overlay and 78.5% with underlay myringoplasty. In 15 out of the 27 surgeries temporalis fascia was used with a graft uptake rate of 80%, the 12 grafts taken from tragus had a graft uptake rate of 58.33%. Conclusion: Underlay myringoplasty technique has higher results than overlay myringoplasty technique.

Retraction pockets

This chapter discusses Nankivell and Pothier’s paper on surgery for tympanic membrane retraction pockets including the design of the study (outcome measures, results, conclusions, and a critique).