Abstract
Background
Multiple techniques in chronic coronary total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have been developed to cross CTOs.
Purpose
To compare recovery of quantitative myocardial blood flow (MBF) after different CTO PCI techniques.
Methods
Consecutive patients with [15O]H2O positron emission tomography perfusion imaging before and three months after successful CTO PCI were included. Change in quantitative hyperemic MBF, coronary flow reserve (CFR) and perfusion defect size were compared between antegrade wire escalation (AWE), retrograde wire escalation (RWE), antegrade dissection and reentry (ADR) and retrograde dissection and reentry (RDR), and further between specific subintimal crossing and reentry techniques.
Results
193 patients were treated with AWE (N=90), RWE (N=24), ADR (N=35) and RDR (N=44). Significant improvements (all p<0.01) in hyperemic MBF (1.19±0.77, 0.94±0.65, 1.09±0.63, and 1.02±0.75 mL min–1 g–1, respectively), CFR (1.34±1.08, 1.14±1.09, 1.31±0.96, and 1.24±0.99, respectively), and perfusion defect size (3.17±2.13, 3.00±2.21, 2.74±2.09, and 2.93±1.92 segments, respectively) were comparable between the four approaches (p=0.40, p=0.84, and p=0.77, respectively). Recovery of hyperemic MBF was less pronounced after subintimal crossing with a knuckle-wire-technique compared to the use of CrossBoss in controlled ADR and RDR (p=0.02), and less after reentry with subintimal tracking and reentry (STAR) in ADR compared with controlled ADR (Stingray) or limited antegrade subintimal tracking (LAST) (p=0.02 and p<0.01).
Conclusions
Recovery of hyperemic MBF, CFR, and perfusion defect size was significant after CTO PCI and comparable between different crossing techniques. Improvement of hyperemic MBF was inferior after using the knuckle-wire subintimal crossing technique and STAR compared to other subintimal crossing and reentry techniques.
Acknowledgement/Funding
None