Hyperreactivity of the bronchi in children, whooping cough convalescents

Objective: to assess the presence and degree of bronchial hyperreactivity in convalescents of whooping cough based on the results of bronchial provocation tests.Materials and methods. Using bronchial provocative samples with a 0,02/0,33% histamine solution and 0,33% methacholine solution on a PROVOTEST-2 apparatus from PARI, bronchial hyperreactivity was studied in 12 pertussis convalescents aged 7 to 17 years. The level of endogenous nitrogen monoxide in exhaled air (FeNO) was measured using a portable NObreath electrochemical analyzer (from Bedfont Scientific Ltd.).The results. According to the results of BPP, 6 of 12 convalescents of whooping cough were found to have bronchial hyperreactivity of varying degrees. When conducting a breath test with a histamine solution, bronchial hyperreactivity was recorded in three children, in a sample with methacholine, in five. In 3 out of 6 children with revealed signs of bronchial hyperreactivity, the history of atopy was not burdened, which suggests a connection between the pertussis and the development of bronchial hyperreactivity. A significant increase in the level of endogenous nitric monoxide (above 16 ppb) was observed in 2 out of 10 patients. Follow-up observation showed that the duration of cough with whooping cough ranged from 3 to 6 months, and in patients with positive results of several tests it was maximum. Two out of three children with bronchial asthma showed elevated levels of FeNO and samples with methacholine. Follow-up observation showed that whooping cough aggravated bronchial asthma and demanded correction therapy.Conclusion. A pilot study on the evaluation of bronchial provocative tests suggests that the formation of bronchial hyperreactivity in convalescents of whooping cough is probable, including without a history of atopy, which increases the risk of developing bronchial asthma, however, additional studies are required for a final conclusion.

Do clinical investigations predict long-term outcome? A follow-up of paediatric respiratory outpatients

IntroductionThe contribution of clinical investigations to prediction of long-term outcomes of children investigated for asthma is unclear.AimWe performed a broad range of clinical tests and investigated whether they helped to predict long-term wheeze among children referred for evaluation of possible asthma.MethodsWe studied children aged 6-16 years referred to two Swiss pulmonary outpatient clinics with a history of wheeze, dyspnoea, or cough in 2007. The initial assessment included spirometry, body plethysmography, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, skin prick tests, and bronchial provocation tests (BPT) by exercise, methacholine, and mannitol. Respiratory symptoms were assessed with questionnaires at baseline and at follow-up seven years later. Associations between baseline factors and wheeze at follow-up were investigated by logistic regression.ResultsAt baseline, 111 children were examined in 2007. Seven years after baseline, 85 (77%) completed the follow-up questionnaire, among whom 61 (72%) had wheeze at baseline, while at follow-up 39 (46%) reported wheeze. Adjusting for age and sex, the following characteristics predicted wheeze at adolescence: wheeze triggered by pets (odds ratio 4.2, 95% CI 1.2-14.8), pollen (2.8, 1.1-7.0), and exercise (3.1, 1.2-8.0). Of the clinical tests, only a positive exercise test (3.2, 1.1-9.7) predicted wheeze at adolescence.ConclusionReported exercise-induced wheeze and wheeze triggered by pets or pollen were important predictors of wheeze persistence into adolescence. None of the clinical tests predicted wheeze more strongly than reported symptoms. Clinical tests might be important for asthma diagnosis but medical history is more helpful in predicting prognosis in children referred for asthma.

Specific bronchial hyperreactivity and hypersensitivity in patients with allergic asthma

Background/Aim. Bronchial asthma is a disease that is characterized by the variability of the clinical picture, physical and functional status and the existence of bronchial hypersensitivity and hyperreactivity with varying degrees. Bronchial responsiveness and sensitivity are tested in patients with clinically suspected existence of asthma and normal spirometry test. The aim of the study was to analyze the patients with atopic asthma and study test results of skin sensitization to inhaled allergens, nonspecific bronchial hyperreactivity and specific hyperreactivity estimated by bronchial provocation tests with inhalant allergens. Methods. The prospective study at the Pulmonology Clinic of the Military Medical Academy in Belgrade Serbia, during 2014, included 70 male subjects aged 18?30 years, who had perennial asthma symptoms. All subjects were nonsmokers, with normal spirometry findings, with normal radiological chest findings and with no symptoms of respiratory infection over the past two months. All respondents were tested with skin prick tests with inhalant allergens and nonspecific bronchial provocation test with histamine. On the basis of histamine test, subjects were divided into two groups: the group I, in which there was a slight degree of hypersensitivity [provocation concentration of histamine causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume ? PC20 = 6.09 ? 1.1 mg/mL], and the group II with negative histamine test (PC20 = 14.58 ? 6.34 mg/mL). Specific bronchial provocation test was performed in all patients, and the selection of the allergens was carried out based on the results of testing of skin hypersensitivity. Results. Results of skin sensitization show the highest incidence of mites Dermatophagoides pterronissinus (83.3% group I and 85.0% group II) followed by grass pollen (53.3% group I and 52.0% group II), and house dust (33.3% group I and 50.0% group II). There were no statistically significant differences in allergens between groups (p > 0.05). In both groups, spirometry findings were within normal values [forced vital capacity ? FVC and forced expiratory volume 1 ? FEV1 > 80% predictive value], but statistically significant difference was found in FEV1 between groups (p < 0.05). Specific bronchial provocation tests with solutions of inhaled allergens in both groups caused a significant decline in FEV1 (? 20%) in all patients individually. No statistically significant differences were found neither between groups, nor between individual allergens (average decline in FEV1: Group I 32.9 ? 2.4% and group II 31.5 ? 2.2%). Conclusion. There is no relationship between the degree of specific and non-specific bronchial hyperreactivity in patients with allergic asthma.