Metastases to the Pituitary Gland: Histological Patterns of Spread and Review of the Literature

Few studies have focused on histological patterns of metastatic spread to the pituitary gland. We review our experience and that in the literature, 1970–present. Departmental cases, 1998–2021, were assessed for anterior versus posterior gland and/or capsular involvement and cohesive tumor obliterating underlying pituitary architecture versus metastatic cells filling pituitary acini with relative acinar preservation. Eleven autopsy/15 surgical cases, including 2 metastases to pituitary adenomas, were identified. Cohesive/obliterative patterns predominated histologically in both surgical and autopsy cases, but acinar filling by metastatic cells was extensive in 3/26 cases, focal in 5/26, and had resulted in initial erroneous impressions of atypical pituitary adenoma/pituitary carcinoma in 1 case and pituitary adenoma with apoplexy in another, likely due to focusing on necrotic areas in the specimen where the acinar pattern had been broken down and not appreciating nearby areas with acinar filling by metastatic cells. Although most pituitary metastases produce readily identifiable cohesive/obliterative patterns, diagnostic challenges remain with the less frequently seen “acinar filling” pattern. A dichotomy exists between patients with symptomatic pituitary metastases occurring early in the disease course and requiring surgical excision versus patients in whom asymptomatic small pituitary metastases are found incidentally at autopsy, the latter almost invariably in late disease stages, with widely disseminated metastatic disease.

Clival Metastasis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with an Initial Histopathological Diagnosis of Atypical Pituitary Adenoma

Histologically, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and atypical pituitary adenoma are similar, posing a potential clinical problem. A 76-year-old woman, whose past medical history was significant for hepatitis C virus (HCV), positivity without liver cirrhosis was presented with abducens nerve (CN VI) palsy. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a clival tumor with infiltration of the right cavernous sinus. Subtotal resection was performed using a right anterior petrosal approach. Histological diagnosis was pituitary adenoma. Thirty-four days after the operation, MRI imaging showed residual tumor growth without any liver masses on computed tomography (CT). The patient underwent a second operation using an endoscopic transnasal transsphenoidal approach. Histological examination of the specimen gave a positive reaction for α-fetoprotein. Repeat whole-body CT showed an enhanced liver mass. Based on these findings, the lesion was diagnosed as metastatic HCC. The patient died of liver failure 6 months later. In this case, tumor diagnosis was difficult because of the histological similarity of HCC and pituitary adenoma, and the fact that the clival tumor grew prior to presentation of the liver mass on CT. This case emphasizes the importance of comparing the pathological diagnosis with the patient's clinical course.

Atypical pituitary adenoma: a clinicopathologic case series

OBJECTIVEIn 2004, the WHO classified atypical pituitary adenoma as a distinct adenoma subtype. However, the clinical significance of this distinction remains undetermined. The authors sought to define patient characteristics, tumor features, and treatment outcomes associated with atypical pituitary adenoma.METHODSThe authors reviewed records of patients who underwent resection of pituitary adenoma at the University of California, San Francisco, between 2007 and 2014. Per institutional protocol, adenomas exhibiting mitotic activity underwent evaluation for all 3 markers of atypicality (mitotic index, extensive p53 staining, and MIB-1 index ≥ 3%). Statistical analyses were performed using χ2, Fisher’s exact test, t-test, log-rank, and logistic regression.RESULTSBetween 2007 and 2014, 701 patients underwent resection for pituitary adenoma. Among these patients, 122 adenomas exhibited mitotic activity and therefore were evaluated for all 3 markers of atypicality, with 36 tumors (5%) proving to be atypical. There were 21 female patients (58%) and 15 male patients (42%) in the atypical cohort, and 313 female patients (47%) and 352 male patients (53%) in the nonatypical cohort (p = 0.231). The mean age of patients in the atypical cohort was 37 years (range 10–65 years), which was significantly lower than the mean age of 49 years (range 10–93 years) for patients in the nonatypical cohort (p < 0.001). The most common presenting symptoms for patients with atypical adenomas were headaches (42%) and visual changes (33%). Atypical adenomas were more likely to be functional (78%) than nonatypical adenomas (42%; p < 0.001). Functional atypical adenomas were significantly larger than functional nonatypical adenomas (mean diameter 2.2 vs 1.4 cm; p = 0.009), as were nonfunctional atypical adenomas compared with nonfunctional nonatypical adenomas (mean diameter 3.3 vs 2.3 cm; p = 0.01). Among the entire adenoma cohort, larger presenting tumor size was associated with cavernous sinus invasion (p < 0.001), and subtotal resection was associated with cavernous sinus invasion (p < 0.001) and larger size (p < 0.001) on binomial multivariate regression. The median time until recurrence was 56 months for atypical adenomas, 129 months for functional nonatypical adenomas, and 204 months for nonfunctional nonatypical adenomas (p < 0.001). Functional atypical adenomas recurred more frequently and significantly earlier than functional nonatypical adenomas (p < 0.001). When accounting for extent of resection, cavernous sinus invasion, size, age, sex, and functional subtype, atypicality remained a significant predictor of earlier recurrence among functional adenomas (p = 0.002).CONCLUSIONSWhen compared with nonatypical pituitary adenomas, atypical adenomas are more likely to present in younger patients at a larger size, are more often hormonally hypersecretory, and are associated with earlier recurrence. These features lend credence to atypical pituitary adenomas being a distinct clinical entity in addition to a discrete pathological diagnosis.

Variability and Lack of Prognostic Value Associated With Atypical Pituitary Adenoma Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Critical Assessment of the Diagnostic Criteria

BACKGROUND Atypical pituitary adenomas (APAs) are a subset of pituitary adenomas (PAs) characterized by the 2004 World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines to have higher risk histopathological features than typical PAs. In July 2017, the WHO published an update to their classification of pituitary tumors and abandoned the APA terminology. OBJECTIVE To assess the prevalence and outcomes of patients diagnosed with APA through a literature review. Focus was placed on variation in the application of the previous WHO criteria and on rates of recurrence. METHODS A systematic review of PubMed (2004-July 2017) was performed to identify studies reporting prevalence and clinical characteristics/outcomes of APA. Eight studies were analyzed for prevalence. Six studies reporting histopathological details were analyzed in depth. RESULTS Of the 7105 included patients, 373 (5.2%) met criteria for APA (prevalence range: 3%-15%). Only 2 of 8 studies utilized identical grading criteria, demonstrating a lack of standardized application. Most APAs (84%) were macroadenomas, with 52% invasive on magnetic resonance imaging. Nonfunctional PAs were most common (37%), followed by prolactinomas (23%) and Growth Hormone adenomas (21%). Recurrence/progression occurred in 21% of APA patients (follow-up range 37-75 mo). Only 2 of 8 studies reported an association between APA diagnosis and recurrence/progression. CONCLUSION Based on diagnostic variability and lack of association with clinical outcomes, refinement of criteria for APA was necessary. The WHO update eliminates the ambiguity in APA diagnosis in favor of criteria that emphasize clinical behavior (invasion, recurrence, and resistance to treatment) and molecular markers. Our review supports abandonment of the previous APA designation due to limited prognostic utility.