Properties of superior vestibular nucleus flocculus target neurons in the squirrel monkey. II. Signal components revealed by reversible flocculus inactivation

1. Seven upward eye velocity flocculus target neurons (FTNs) and two flocculus projecting neurons (FPNs) were studied before and after ipsilateral flocculus inactivation by injection of muscimol in the alert squirrel monkey. An additional seven FTNs and seven FPNs recorded from the corresponding FTN and FPN areas were recorded after injection. Response properties of FTNs and FPNs were characterized by visual-vestibular interaction paradigms and were compared before and after flocculus inactivation. 2. In FTNs the mean firing rate increased within 2-5 min after muscimol injection in the flocculus and reached a plateau level in approximately 10-20 min. The average mean firing rate for seven FTNs increased from 117 to 174 spikes/s, a net increase of 57 spikes/s (49%). Accompanying the large increase of the mean firing rate, a spontaneous nystagmus in the darkness developed with the slow phase directed upward and contralateral. 3. The firing rate modulation during visual following of a sinusoidal optokinetic drum (0.5 Hz) decreased within 2-5 min after muscimol injection in the flocculus and reached a level of 0 in approximately 10-20 min for all FTNs. After that, some cells remained unmodulated for the period of recording; other cells gradually reversed their phase and developed a modulation out of phase with drum velocity. The depletion of the visual following eye velocity signal on superior vestibular nucleus (SVN) FTNs accompanied a small but consistent decrease of visual following eye velocity amplitude. The average maximum decrease of eye velocity was 26 +/- 9% (mean +/- SD). 4. After flocculus inactivation, even though the modulation response at 0.5 Hz during visual following was abolished, a slow-component eye velocity signal with the same on direction was revealed by a constant-velocity optokinetic stimulus. It is concluded that there are at least two kinds of eye velocity signals during the optokinetic response. These signals are combined at the FTNs and are subsequently relayed to the oculomotor neurons. The source of the fast component is the flocculus, and the source of the slow component is another, as yet unidentified brain structure. 5. The effect of flocculus inactivation on the modulation amplitude during the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) in darkness was variable: two cells did not change, two cells decreased, and three cells increased their amplitude. The response phase tended to move toward a phase lead, but the change was small. The effect on VOR suppression was more prominent.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Properties of superior vestibular nucleus flocculus target neurons in the squirrel monkey. I. General properties in comparison with flocculus projecting neurons

1. Using single-unit recording and microstimulation methods, a group of flocculus target neurons (FTNs) were identified in the superior vestibular nucleus (SVN) and were studied using visual-vestibular interaction paradigms in alert squirrel monkeys. The response properties of these FTNs were characterized and compared with those of flocculus projecting neurons (FPNs). 2. FTNs were monosynaptically inhibited by single-pulse flocculus stimulation. The mean inhibition latency was 1.0 +/- 0.57 (SD) ms (n = 40) and the mean inhibition period was 6.7 +/- 2.69 ms. FTNs were also monosynaptically activated by VIIIth nerve stimulation. The mean response latency was 1.10 +/- 0.25 ms (n = 12). This is about the same as that of the FPNs (1.14 +/- 0.16 ms, n = 17). 3. The most characteristic response property of the FTNs is their firing rate modulation during visual following eye movements induced by sinusoidal rotation of an optokinetic drum at 0.5 Hz. This modulation was mainly related to eye velocity and was therefore termed a visual following eye velocity signal. The average eye velocity gain for all FTNs is 0.79 spikes.s-1.deg-1.s-1. In contrast, the responses of FPNs were not modulated under the same conditions. 4. Even though FTNs are inhibited by the flocculus, they have a relatively higher mean firing rate (124 +/- 23 spikes/s, n = 45) than FPNs (66 +/- 28 spikes/s, n = 42). The underlying mechanism may be related to commissural facilitation of FTNs and commissural inhibition of FPNs. 5. Thirty FTNs were identified as upward eye velocity FTNs because their firing rate increased for upward eye velocity during a visual following eye movement. The mean eye velocity sensitivity was 1.09 spikes.s-1.deg-1.s-1. Most of these cells also modulated during vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) in the dark, with firing rate increasing for downward head velocity. During VOR suppression the firing rate either did not modulate or modulated in phase with head or drum velocity with a smaller amplitude in comparison with the response during visual following. For all cells (with 1 exception) the response during a visual following eye movement can be approximately predicted by a linear vectorial subtraction of the response during VOR suppression and the response during VOR in the dark [modulation response vector of FTNs during visual following of the optokinetic stimulus (OKR) approximately modulation response vector of FTNs during VOR suppression-modulation response vector of FTNs during VOR in the dark].(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Properties of superior vestibular nucleus neurons projecting to the cerebellar flocculus in the squirrel monkey

1. Properties of superior vestibular nucleus (SVN) neurons and their projection to the cerebellar flocculus were studied in alert squirrel monkeys by using chronic unit and eye movement recording and microstimulation techniques. Twenty-three cells were antidromically activated from the ipsilateral flocculus, and seventeen of these were also orthodromically activated from the ipsilateral VIIth nerve at monosynaptic latencies. Only 1 of these 23 units was also inhibited by flocculus stimulation. According to their response properties, 9 of the cells were pure vestibular, 2 were vestibular-pause, and 12 were position-vestibular cells. The mean eye position sensitivity of these position-vestibular cells was significantly lower than that of cells projecting to the oculomotor nucleus (OMN). No eye movement-only neurons were antidromically activated from the flocculus. No cells could be antidromically activated from both the oculomotor nucleus and the flocculus.