experimental participant
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

3
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

0
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
Risqi Fajril ◽  
Almasri Almasri ◽  
Andris Syukur

AbstractThis research is aimed to know the difference between Team Games Tournament model  and Cooperative model in learning ouput in Teknik Elektronika Dasar for grade X Electronic Engineering of SMKN 1 Sumatera Barat on entire semester, academic year 2014/2015. This type of research is quasi experimental. Participant were slected by non-probability sampling technique with purposive sampling. 24 students from Class X TAV, which served as a controling class, used Cooperative model. 28 students from Class X Mechatronic, which served as experimental class, used student cooperative type Team Games Tournament model. Data is collected from the final test then was analyzed for homogeneity testing, normality and hypothesis testing. The result indicates that experimental class has mean 79,29, while controlling class has mean 70,17. The result of hypothessis testing on significant level α=0,05 is 4,583 > 1,676 and the percentage effect 12.997 %. Since the tcount is higher than the t table, then Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted. It can be inferred that Team Games Tournament model is better than Cooperative  model. Keywords: Team Games Tournament model, Cooperative  model, Learning outcomes


Author(s):  
Randi Winanda ◽  
Hanesman Hanesman ◽  
Almasri Almasri

This research is aimed to know the difference between Contextual Teaching and Learning model  and Cooperative model in learning ouput in Teknik Listrik for grade X Electronic Engineering of SMKN 1 Padang on entire semester, academic year 2014/2015. This type of research is quasi experimental. Participant were slected by non-probability sampling technique with purposive sampling. 30 students from Class X AVB, which served as a controling class, used Cooperative model. 30 students from Class X AVA, which served as experimental class, used student cooperative type Contextual Teaching and Learning model. Data is collected from the final test then was analyzed for homogeneity testing, normality and hypothesis testing. The result indicates that experimental class has mean 79,6, while controlling class has mean 77,4. The result of hypothessis testing on significant level α=0,05 is 2,01 > 1,70 and the percentage effect 2.84 %. Since the tcount is higher than the t table, then Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted. It can be inferred that Contextual Teaching and Learning model is better than Cooperative  model. Keywords: Contextual Teaching and Learning model, Cooperative  model, Learning outcomes


Author(s):  
Nadia Utari ◽  
Putra Jaya ◽  
Hanesman Hanesman

The purpose of this study is to know the difference between learning model of quantum teaching that combine with the technic record writing and structure and learning model of direct instruction in learning ouput on Menerapkan Dasar-Dasar Kelistrikan dan Elektronika for grade X TAV of SMK Negeri 5 Padang on odd semester, academic year 2013/2014. This type of research is true experimental. Participant were slected by non-probability sampling technique with purposive sampling. 30 students from Class XE3 TAV, which served as a controling class, used learning model of direct instruction. 30 students from Class XE1 TAV, which served as experimental class, used learning model of quantum teaching that combine with the technic record writing and structure. Data is collected from the final test then was analyzed for homogeneity testing, normality and hypothesis testing. The result indicates that experimental class has mean 78,7, while controlling class has mean 69,7. The result of hypothessis testing on significant level α = 0,05 is 4,887 > 2,042. Since the tcount is higher than the t table, then H0 is rejected and H1 is accepted. It can be inferred that learning model of quantum teaching that combine with the technic record writing and structure is better than learning model of direct instruction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document