Physiological predictors of cardiorespiratory fitness in children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis without ventilatory limitation

Objectives: [1] To investigate the cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) levels in children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis (CF) with no ventilatory limitation (ventilatory reserve ⩾ 15%) during exercise, and [2] to assess which physiological factors are related to CRF. Methods: A cross-sectional study design was used in 8- to 18-year-old children and adolescents with CF. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing was used to determine peak oxygen uptake normalized to body weight as a measure of CRF. Patients were defined as having ‘low CRF’ when CRF was less than 82%predicted. Physiological predictors used in this study were body mass index z-score, P. Aeruginosa lung infection, impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) including CF-related diabetes, CF-related liver disease, sweat chloride concentration, and self-reported physical activity. Backward likelihood ratio (LR) logistic regression analysis was used. Results: Sixty children and adolescents (51.7% boys) with a median age of 15.3 years (25th–75th percentile: 12.9–17.0 years) and a mean percentage predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second of 88.5% (±16.9) participated. Mean percentage predicted CRF (ppVO2peak/kg) was 81.4% (±12.4, range: 51%–105%). Thirty-three patients (55.0%) were classified as having ‘low CRF’. The final model that best predicted low CRF included IGT ( p = 0.085; Exp(B) = 6.770) and P. Aeruginosa lung infection (p = 0.095; Exp(B) = 3.945). This model was able to explain between 26.7% and 35.6% of variance. Conclusions: CRF is reduced in over half of children and adolescents with CF with normal ventilatory reserve. Glucose intolerance and P. Aeruginosa lung infection seem to be associated to low CRF in children and adolescents with CF.

Regulation of ventilatory capacity during exercise in asthmatics

In asthmatic and control subjects, we examined the changes in ventilatory capacity (VECap), end-expiratory lung volume (EELV), and degree of flow limitation during three types of exercise: 1) incremental, 2) constant load (50% of maximal exercise capacity; 36 min), and 3) interval (alternating between 60 and 40% of maximal exercise capacity; 6-min workloads for 36 min). The VECap and degree of flow limitation at rest and during the various stages of exercise were estimated by aligning the tidal breathing flow-volume (F-V) loops within the maximal expiratory F-V (MEFV) envelope using the measured EELV. In contrast to more usual estimates of VECap (i.e., maximal voluntary ventilation and forced expiratory volume in 1 s x 40), the calculated VECap depended on the existing bronchomotor tone, the lung volume at which the subjects breathed (i.e., EELV), and the tidal volume. During interval and constant-load exercise, asthmatic subjects experienced reduced ventilatory reserve, higher degrees of flow limitation, and had higher EELVs compared with nonasthmatic subjects. During interval exercise, the VECap of the asthmatic subjects increased and decreased with variations in minute ventilation, due in part to alterations in their MEFV curve as exercise intensity varied between 60 and 49% of maximal capacity. In conclusion, asthmatic subjects have a more variable VECap and reduced ventilatory reserve during exercise compared with nonasthmatic subjects. The variations in VECap are due in part to a more labile MEFV curve secondary to changes in bronchomotor tone. Asthmatics defend VECap and minimize flow limitation by increasing EELV.

Estimation of ventilatory capacity during submaximal exercise

There is presently no precise way to determine ventilatory capacity for a given individual during exercise; however, this information would be helpful in evaluating ventilatory reserve during exercise. Using schematic representations of maximal expiratory flow-volume curves and individual maximal expiratory flow-volume curves from four subjects, we describe a technique for estimating ventilatory capacity. In these subjects, we measured maximal expiratory flow-volume loops at rest and tidal flow-volume loops and inspiratory capacity (IC) during submaximal cycle ergometry. We also compared minute ventilation (VE) during submaximal exercise with calculated ventilatory maxima (VEmaxCal) and with maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV) to estimate ventilatory reserve. Using the schematic flow-volume curves, we demonstrated the theoretical effect of maximal expiratory flow and lung volume on ventilatory capacity and breathing pattern. In the subjects, we observed that the estimation of ventilatory reserve with use of VE/VEmaxCal was most helpful in indicating when subjects were approaching maximal expiratory flow over a large portion of tidal volume, especially at submaximal exercise levels where VE/VEmaxCal and VE/MVV differed the most. These data suggest that this technique may be useful in estimating ventilatory capacity, which could then be used to evaluate ventilatory reserve during exercise.