anaphor processing
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

9
(FIVE YEARS 4)

H-INDEX

2
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-21
Author(s):  
Inmaculada Fajardo ◽  
Ana I. Pérez ◽  
Antonio Ferrer ◽  
Patricia Pérez-Fuster ◽  
Ana C. García-Blanco

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 381-396
Author(s):  
Justin Lauro ◽  
Ana I. Schwartz
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 323-344
Author(s):  
Lea A. Hald ◽  
H. Wind Cowles ◽  
Alan Garnham

AbstractThe goal of this study is to better understand when (and why) the combination of semantic overlap between antecedent and anaphor and antecedent focus leads to difficulty in anaphor processing. To investigate these questions, three ERP experiments manipulating semantic overlap and focus compared the ERPs from the onset of the anaphor as well as from the onset of the last word in the sentence containing the anaphor. Our results suggest that although the focus status of an antecedent and the semantic overlap between the antecedent and anaphor are important, these factors are not the only significant contributors to online anaphor resolution. Factors such as readers’ expectations about thematic shifts also influence the processing. We consider our results in relation to two accounts of anaphor resolution, the Informational Load Hypothesis (Almor, 1999; Almor & Eimas, 2008) and JANUS (Garnham & Cowles, 2008).


2017 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Laurinavichyute ◽  
Lena A. Jäger ◽  
Yulia Akinina ◽  
Jennifer Roß ◽  
Olga Dragoy

1988 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 297-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronan G. Reilly
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document