longevity insurance
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

37
(FIVE YEARS 5)

H-INDEX

6
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoki Kitamura ◽  
Kunio Nakashima

Purpose Deferred annuities, which offer longevity insurance with relatively low premiums, are a potential payout option in defined contribution (DC) pension plans in Japan. This study aims to measure individual preferences for these annuities. Design/methodology/approach This study conducts stated choice experiments using an original internet survey. This methodology provides a decision-making scenario similar to that faced by individuals when making real retirement saving decisions. Subjective valuations of deferred, immediate and term annuities are compared. Findings This study finds that male individuals have an insignificant preference for deferred annuities – the benefits of which begin at an advanced age. On average, deferred annuities are considered a gamble, betting against life and individuals who are married and have higher financial assets tend to value them less. Originality/value While previous studies, based on theory and simulations, have found that deferred annuities should be included in individual retirement assets, this study examines annuity preferences from the demand side (i.e. DC plan participants) –an approach that has not been addressed in the literature.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-53
Author(s):  
Cormac O’Dea ◽  
David Sturrock

Abstract The “annuity puzzle” refers to the fact that annuities are rarely purchased despite the longevity insurance they provide. Most explanations for this puzzle assume that individuals have accurate expectations about their future survival. We provide evidence that individuals misperceive their mortality risk, and study the demand for annuities in a setting where annuities are priced by insurers on the basis of objectively-measured survival probabilities but in which individuals make purchasing decisions based on their own subjective survival probabilities. Subjective expectations have the capacity to explain significant rates of non-annuitization, yielding a quantitatively important explanation for the annuity puzzle.


2020 ◽  
Vol 76 (4) ◽  
pp. 119-133
Author(s):  
Dale Kintzel ◽  
John A. Turner
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
John A. Turner ◽  
Gerard Hughes ◽  
Agnieszka Chłoń-Domińczak ◽  
David M. Rajnes

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 154-161
Author(s):  
John A. Turner ◽  
Gerard Hughes ◽  
Agnieszka Chłoń-Domińcak ◽  
David M. Rajnes

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 450-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
LANS BOVENBERG ◽  
THEO NIJMAN

AbstractTo improve the design of the pay-out phase of DC plans, this paper proposes a new approach to structure pension products: the Personal Pension with Risk sharing (PPR). By unbundling and valuing the investment, (dis)saving, insurance and risk-sharing functions of pensions, PPRs allow risk management and (dis)saving to be customized to the specific features of heterogeneous individuals. Unlike variable annuities, PPRs allow investment risks to be combined with longevity insurance without giving rise to high year-on-year volatility in consumption streams or opaque and rigid valuation and smoothing rules. The synthesis of a PPR structure provides new opportunities for product innovation and for the comparison of retirement products.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document