Kebijakan Pemerintah Daerah Dalam Perubahan Data Akta Kelahiran di Disdukcapil Kabupaten Karanganyar

<p>This study aims to find out the main causes of birth certificate data changes in the Population and Civil Registration Office of Karanganyar Regency, to know the policies of the Karanganyar District Government in the settlement of cases of changes in birth certificate data, and to know the inhibitory factors and supporting local government policies in resolving cases of changes in birth certificate data in Karanganyar Regency.In this study used an empirical juridical approach. With data collection techniques through observation, interview, and documentation studies. The results showed that the main cause of the name change case as in the Court Determination No. 2/Pdt.P/2021/PN Krg name change on the birth certificate was done because the applicant is better known in his residential environment as Antok Saryanto than Saryanto.Then in the case of correcting the name of the parent on the birth certificate in the name of Esti Rahayu the correction was done because there was an error in writing the name of the parent, Sumarsih should be Sunarsih as written on the Family Card and the parent's Marriage Certificate. Karanganyar District Government Policy in resolving cases of changes in birth certificate data in accordance with the provisions in the legislation The inhibitory factors of this policy are cultural factors and community factors. Supporting factors are legal factors, law enforcement factors, and facilities or facilities factors.</p>

Seeking Evidence of The MAGA Cult and Trump Derangement Syndrome: An Examination of (A)symmetric Political Bias

Three studies sought to explore the existence of (a)symmetric bias regarding Donald Trump. In Study 1, participants read one of three statements expressing different degrees of favorability toward electing the President of the United States via a National Popular Vote attributed to Trump or an anonymous source. In Study 2, participants read one of two statements either favoring or disfavoring the name change of the Washington NFL franchise, and the statement was attributed to either Trump or an anonymous source. In Study 3, Trump and Biden voters were asked to rate their support or opposition to counting all the votes in battleground states when continued counting was expected to either help Trump or Biden. Results for all three studies supported the asymmetric bias hypothesis. Trump supporters consistently showed bias in favor of the interests and ostensible positions of Trump, whereas Trump’s detractors did not show an opposing bias.

European Integration as New National Mythology: On The Resolution of the Macedonian Name Dispute

The paper examines the effect that the resolution of the naming dispute between North Macedonia and Greece has on the re-definition of the Macedonian nation. It discusses the narratives of supporters and opponents to the Prespa Agreement and poses the question of whether the European integration (under which auspices the name change occurred) has indeed served as new national mythology for Macedonians.

Effects of Renaming Schizophrenia on Destigmatization among Medical Students in One Taiwan University

The stigma associated with serious mental illnesses causes a huge burden on patients, their families, and society. In October 2012, in Taiwan, schizophrenia was renamed to reduce the stigma associated with this disease. The aim of this study was to compare the differences of public stigma, self-stigma, and social distance associated with schizophrenia between old and new name of schizophrenia in medical students. A cross-sectional survey was administered to 180 medical students of Taipei Medical University from October 2014 to February 2015. In total, 123 complete questionnaires were included in this study. Participants completed the modified attribution questionnaire, the perceived psychiatric stigma scale, and modified social distance scale to assess public stigma, self-stigma, and social distance, respectively. We also collected basic demographic data and previous experience of contact with people with mental illness. In total, 52 and 71 of the first- and fourth-year medical students, respectively, participated in the study. Among them, there were 51 females and 72 males. A significant difference in age was observed between the first- and fourth-year groups (20.2 ± 1.7 years vs. 22.7 ± 0.9 years, p < 0.001). After renaming schizophrenia, we noted significant differences in the scores in the modified attribution questionnaire, the perceived psychiatric stigma scale, and the modified social distance scale in all participants and the fourth-year students, respectively. Female gender (Beta = 0.230, p = 0.018) was significantly associated with the difference in the score of the modified attribution questionnaire after name change. The difference in the score of the perceived psychiatric stigma scale after the name change (Beta = 0.277, p = 0.004) and age (Beta = −0.186, p = 0.049) were significantly associated with the difference in the score of the modified social distance scale after name change. In conclusion, renaming was associated with the changes in the scores of the modified attribution questionnaire, the perceived psychiatric stigma scale, and the modified social distance scale toward individuals with schizophrenia in medical students of one Taiwan university. Further studies with large sample sizes, diverse participant backgrounds, and that monitor the subsequent behavioral changes are warranted.