How Did God Hate Esau (Malachi 1:2–3)?

The Antonyms “love” And “hate” In Biblical Covenant Contexts And Ancient Near East Political Texts Refer Respectively To Keeping And Not Keeping Covenant Or Treaty Commitments. This Same General Sense Is Found In The Marital Covenant Framework. One Case Involves Leah Being Described As “hated” And Rachel As “loved.” As Jacob’s First Wife, Leah Had Covenantal Matriarchal Rights, Which Were Disregarded In Deference To Her Younger Sister, Rachel, Jacob’s Second Wife. Against This Background, The Proposal Made Here Is That The Diametrically Opposite Divine Disposition Regarding Jacob And Esau In Malachi 1:2–3 Has To Do With Covenant Succession— God’s Disregard For The Right Of Primogeniture Of Esau, Said To Be “hated,” In Deference To His Younger Twin, Jacob, Said To Be “loved.” KEYWORDS: Malachi 1:2–3, Romans 9:13, Genesis 29:30–33, Deuteronomy 21:15–17, Love, Hate, Jacob, Esau, Rachel, Leah, Covenant, Marriage, Primogeniture

IMPLEMENTASI YURIDIS PERJANJIAN KAWIN DALAM SISTEM HUKUM POSITIF DI INDONESIA

Marital agreement is part of the ?eld of family law which must comply with the provisions of Book I of the Civil Code (BW) Setting of the marriage covenant in the Book of the Civil Code Act is described in Part VII of the Civil Code Article 139 s / d 154. Broadly speaking, marital agreements are binding the party / bride in case of marriage. Based on Article 139 of the Civil Code (BW), the existence of the agreement to marry is as an exception of provision of Article 119 of the Civil Code, namely when the marriage takes place then legally valid rounded unity between the wealth of the husband and wife or in other words the extent set. Article 139 of the Civil Code contains a principle that the prospective husband and wife are free to determine the contents of the marriage covenant they made. However, these freedoms are limited by some restrictions that must be considered by a prospective husband and wife who will make a covenant marriage. The substance of the agreement is not contrary to public order (openbareorde), decency, and religious law.

Covenant Marriage and the Conflict of Laws

Recently, three American stales introduced covenant marriage as a new form of marriage in response to the rising divorce rate. The author examines the threedistinguishing characteristics of covenant marriage that distinguish it from the current form of marriage offered in the United States and Canada. For the United States, the author canvasses the possibility of separating jurisdiction from choice of law. separating subject matter jurisdiction from personal jurisdiction, and recognition of the parties' intent, as three possible alternatives that non-covenant marriage states can utilize in order to respect the parties' intentions and the covenant marriage state's legislative intent. For Canada, the author canvasses the possibility that while Canada could take jurisdiction on the "ordinarily resident" basis, they may refuse jurisdiction on the basis of <i>forum non conveniens</i> or, alternatively, that they may apply the substantive law of the covenant marriage state on the basis that the Declaration of Intent signed by the parties represents an express choice of law clause.