Co-accretion + Giant Impact Origin of the Uranus System: Post-impact Evolution

We investigate aspects of the co-accretion + giant impact scenario proposed by Morbidelli et al. (2012) for the origin of the Uranian satellites. In this model, a regular satellite system formed during gas accretion is impulsively destabilized by a Uranus-tipping impact, producing debris that ultimately re-orients to the planet’s new equatorial plane and re-accumulates into Uranus’ current large moons. We first investigate the nodal randomization of a disk of debris resulting from disruptive collisions between the hypothesized prior satellites. Consistent with Morbidelli et al., we find that an impact-generated interior c-disk with mass ≥10−2 Uranus masses is needed to cause sufficient nodal randomization to appropriately realign the outer debris disk. We then simulate the reaccumulation of the outer debris disk into satellites and find that disks with larger initial radii are needed to produce an outer debris disk that extends to Oberon’s distance, and that Uranus’ obliquity prior to the giant impact must have been substantial, ≥40°, if its original co-accreted satellite system was broadly similar in radial scale to those at Jupiter and Saturn today. Finally, we explore the subsequent evolution of a massive, water-dominated inner c-disk as it condenses, collisionally spreads, and spawns new moons beyond the Roche limit. We find that intense tidal dissipation in Uranus (i.e., ( Q / k 2 ) U ≤ 10 2 ) is needed to prevent large icy moons spawned from the inner disk from expanding beyond the synchronous orbit, where they would be long lived and inconsistent with the lack of massive inner moons at Uranus today. We conclude that while a co-accretion + giant impact is viable it requires rather specific conditions.

Topography and geology of Uranian mid-sized icy satellites in comparison with Saturnian and Plutonian satellites

Newly processed global imaging and topographic mapping of Uranus's five major satellites reveal differences and similarities to mid-sized satellites at Saturn and Pluto. Three modes of internal heat redistribution are recognized. The broad similarity of Miranda's three oval resurfacing zones to those mapped on Enceladus and (subtly) on Dione are likely due to antipodal diapiric upwelling. Conversely, break-up and foundering of crustal blocks accompanied by extensive (cryo)volcanism is the dominant mode on both Charon and Ariel. Titania's fault network finds parallels on Rhea, Dione, Tethys and possibly Oberon. Differences in the geologic style of resurfacing in the satellite systems (e.g. plains on Charon, Dione, Tethys and perhaps Titania versus ridges on Miranda and Ariel) may be driven by differences in ice composition. Surface processes such as volatile transport may also be indicated by bright and dark materials on Oberon, Umbriel and Charon. The more complete and higher quality observations of the Saturnian and Plutonian mid-sized icy satellites by Cassini and New Horizons reveal a wealth of features and phenomena that cannot be perceived in the more limited Voyager coverage of the Uranian satellites, harbingers of many discoveries awaiting us on a return to Uranus. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue ‘Future exploration of ice giant systems'.

Characterization of the precision premium in astrometry

ABSTRACT The precision premium, a concept in astrometry that was first presented by Pascu in 1994, initially means that the relative positional measurement of the Galilean satellites of Jupiter will be more accurate when their separations are small. Correspondingly, many observations have been obtained of these Galilean satellites since it was introduced. However, the exact range of separations at which the precision premium takes effect is not clear yet, nor the variation of the precision with separation. In this article, observations of open cluster M35 are used to study the precision premium and the newest star catalogue Gaia DR2 is used in data reduction. Our results show that the precision premium applies at less than 100 arcsec for two specific objects and the relative positional precision can be well fitted by a sigmoidal function. Observations of Uranian satellites are also reduced as an example of the precision premium.