Favorable Outcomes with Thiotepa/Busulfan-Based Conditioning and Autotransplant for Patients with Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma and Secondary CNS Involvement

Introduction : Central nervous system (CNS) relapse is a devastating complication affecting ~5% of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The optimal management is unknown and survival rates are ~20% in contemporary series. Thiotepa/busulfan-based high-dose chemotherapy (HDT) and autotransplant (ASCT) has demonstrated efficacy in primary CNS lymphoma, but there have been fewer studies of this conditioning regimen in secondary CNS lymphoma (SCNSL). Methods : This multicenter retrospective study included all consecutive patients ≥18 years old with aggressive B-cell lymphoma and secondary CNS involvement treated with thiotepa/busulfan-based HDT/ASCT at the University of Calgary and University of Alberta since 2005. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and disease-specific survival (DSS) from the time of ASCT. Data collection is underway for all consecutively diagnosed SCNSL patients at our institutions to evaluate frequency and predictors of HDT/ASCT use. Results : This study included 57 patients with DLBCL (n=45), double-hit lymphoma (n=6), high-grade B-cell lymphoma NOS (n=2), intravascular large B-cell lymphoma (n=2), or T-cell/histiocyte-rich large B-cell lymphoma (n=2). Two (4%) had previously treated indolent B-cell lymphoma and 1 (2%) had multiply relapsed DLBCL. Median International Prognostic Index was 4 (range 0-5) at DLBCL diagnosis and median time to CNS relapse was 4 months (range 0-139). Median age was 58 years (range 20-73) and median ECOG was 3 (range 0-4) at diagnosis of SCNSL. CNS involvement was present at initial diagnosis in 20 (35%) patients or developed during frontline treatment in 10 (18%) or after completion of treatment in 27 (47%). For those without SCNSL at diagnosis, isolated CNS relapse occurred in 31 (84%) patients while 6 (16%) had concurrent CNS and systemic relapse. Most patients (n=54, 94%) received high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX)-based multiagent induction chemotherapy (median HD-MTX doses 4, range 1-5) followed by peripheral blood stem cell mobilization with rituximab, dexamethasone, cytarabine, and cisplatin (R-DHAP) in 41 (72%). HDT conditioning regimens were thiotepa, busulfan, melphalan, rituximab (TBMR, n=52, 91%) or thiotepa, busulfan, cyclophosphamide (TBC, n=5, 9%). Median time from SCNSL diagnosis to ASCT was 116 days (range 7-201). Median time to neutrophil engraftment was 10 days (range 7-15) and to platelet engraftment 16 days (range 9-93). Overall response rates (ORR) for systemic/CNS disease were 93%/89% pre-ASCT and 95%/100% post-ASCT. Combined ORR pre-ASCT was 88%, with complete response in 21% and partial response in 67%. Two (4%) patients who developed CNS relapse immediately prior to ASCT achieved long-term remission after TBMR conditioning without any other systemic chemotherapy. With a median follow-up time of 4.0 years (range 0.1-15.9), PFS was 75% (95% CI 61-85%), OS was 76% (95% CI 62-86%), and DSS was 79% (95% CI 64-88%) at 4 years after ASCT. Lymphoma recurred in 9 (16%) patients at median 88 days (range 54-346) after ASCT with CNS relapse (n=4), systemic relapse (n=3), or both (n=2). There were 2 (4%) deaths due to peri-transplant toxicity and 1 (2%) death at 1.5 years due to therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia; no other unexpected toxicities of HDT/ASCT were observed. Among the 45 (79%) patients achieving long-term disease-specific survival, none were treated with CNS radiation therapy and only 1 (2%) had persistent neurocognitive impairment. There were no significant differences in DSS with respect to timing of CNS relapse, concurrent presence of systemic disease, or TBMR versus TBC conditioning (78% vs 80%, p=0.87). Conclusion : In one of the largest studies of this conditioning regimen in SCNSL to date, we found that high-dose thiotepa/busulfan-based conditioning with ASCT is associated with favorable outcomes for patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma and secondary CNS involvement, with 4-year OS ~75% in this study. Although SCNSL has been historically associated with a poor prognosis, an increasing proportion of patients may achieve long-term survival after intensive therapy with HD-MTX-based induction and thiotepa/busulfan-based HDT and ASCT. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Chua: Eisai: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria. Stewart: Novartis: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Sandoz: Honoraria; Teva: Honoraria.

Good Outcome after R-Hyper-CVAD/R-MA in High-Risk Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma: A Single-Center Experience

INTRODUCTION Patients with high-risk aggressive B-cell lymphoma exhibit poor survival after R-CHOP-like immunochemotherapy. More intensive regimens yield higher rates of remission but also of complication, which have hindered their use, particularly in older patients. At Karolinska, the standard intensive regimen has been R-Hyper-CVAD/R-MA for patients with high-risk characteristics, such as high age-adjusted international prognostic index (aaIPI) and extranodal disease. METHODS In this analysis, high-risk disease was defined as aaIPI ≥ 2 or any extranodal involvement. We examined Karolinska's 136 patients who received at least one cycle of R-Hyper-CVAD/R-MA in first-line therapy for high-risk disease, excluding Burkitt, transformed, and primary CNS lymphoma. Patients were diagnosed between 2006 and 2020; 89 were diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, 23 high-grade B-cell lymphoma, 17 primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, 4 T cell/histiocyte-rich B-cell lymphoma, 2 aggressive B-cell lymphoma unspecified, 1 lymphomatoid granulomatosis grade 3. For outcome, we investigated progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS In this cohort of 136 patients with high-risk disease treated with at least one cycle of R-Hyper-CVAD/R-MA, the median age was 52 years (range, 19-69); 36 patients (26%) were 61-69 years old. Lactate dehydrogenase was elevated in 92%, stage III-IV disease was seen in 93%, WHO performance status ≥2 in 49%, aaIPI = 3 in 38%, extranodal disease in 30%, CNS involvement in 17%, and Charlson comorbidity index ≥2 in 11%. At 5 years, the PFS in all patients was 72% and in the 50 patients with aaIPI = 3, 66% (Figure 1). In patients ≤60 years old, 5-year PFS was 76% (aaIPI = 3, 69%). In patients 61-69 years, the 5-year PFS was 58% (aaIPI = 3, 59%). Six out of 136 patients (4%) died from toxicity during induction therapy (3/6 were 61-69 years old). CONCLUSIONS This is to our knowledge the largest published single-center series of patients treated with R-Hyper-CVAD/R-MA for high-risk aggressive B-cell lymphoma. Outcome in these patients aged 19-69 years was excellent, with 5-year PFS 72%. Particularly patients with aaIPI = 3 showed rather good outcome with 5-year PFS 66%. For comparison, in Sweden the 5-year overall survival of R-CHOP-treated patients ≤60 years with aaIPI = 3 is 40% (Melén CM et al. Brit J Haematol. 614-622. 2016). We will continue to explore R-Hyper-CVAD/R-MA as primary therapy for high-risk aggressive B-cell lymphoma. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Wahlin: Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Effect of Steroid Treatment on the Diagnostic Yield of Baseline PET CT in Aggressive B Cell Lymphoma

Aggressive B cell lymphomas often require prompt steroid treatment prior to baseline 18f-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography (PET CT) scan and definitive treatment in order to alleviate symptoms and/or prevent organ damage. Since lymphomas are a steroid sensitive malignancy, there is a concern that steroid prophase might affect PET CT results and diagnostic yield. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate the effect of steroid treatment prior to baseline PET CT scan on the standardized uptake value (SUV) max and additional PET CT parameters by examining two groups of patients: steroid-naïve and steroid-treated patients. The effect of steroid administration on SUV max was examined across different daily and weekly steroid doses and durations of treatment. Between January of 2017 and May 2020, 187 newly diagnosed patients with aggressive B cell lymphoma who had a pre-treatment PET CT scan were evaluated. 160 patients (85.5%) had Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL)/ High-grade B-cell lymphoma, 13 patients (7%) had primary mediastinal (thymic) large B-cell lymphoma, 9 patients (4.8%) had primary DLBCL of the central nervous system and 5 patients (2.7%) had Burkitt lymphoma. 132 patients (70.6%) were included in the steroid-naïve group and 55 patients (29.4%) in the steroid-treated group. In the steroid-treated group, the mean duration of steroid treatment was 10.49 (±9.28) days. Average daily dose of steroid treatment was equivalent to 72.27 (±36) mg of prednisone and the mean cumulative prednisone dose during the week prior to PET CT scan was equivalent to 367.95 (±239.9) mg of prednisone. There was no statistical significant difference between the groups in age, gender or KI67. However, patients in the steroid treated group had a significantly higher stage of disease compared to the steroid-naïve group (mean 3.44 compared to 2.99, respectively, p=0.01). The steroid-treated group also had a trend towards a higher IPI score (mean 2.45 versus 2.08, p=0.08) and a trend towards a higher LDH level (mean 2309.89 U/L, range 250-81374 versus mean 877.65 U/L, range 272-22036, p= 0.07), as depicted in table 1. There was no statistical difference in SUV max between the steroid-naïve and steroid-treated groups (p=0.97). This was consistent across various steroid treatment durations and dosage regimes. Patients in the steroid-treated group had a trend towards a higher tumor burden and a larger tumor volume compared to the steroid-naïve group, however it did not reach statistical significance. Mean tumor volume was 179.04 cm 3 in the steroid naïve group and 337.06 cm 3 in the steroid treated group (p=0.17). Mean tumor burden was 1944.84 in the steroid-naïve group and 3016.94 in the steroid-treated group (p=0.09). There was no difference in additional PET CT parameters including SUV mean, SUV max and SUV mean of liver and mediastinum between the groups as depicted in table 2. In conclusion, in aggressive B cell lymphoma, pre-treatment with steroids prior to initial PET CT scan does not affect SUV max or other PET CT parameters and does not reduce PET CT diagnostic yield. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Gurion: Medison: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; JC Health Care: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria.

Aggressive B-cell lymphoma cases with 11q aberration patterns indicate a spectrum beyond Burkitt-like lymphoma

The recent characterization of a group of non-MYC rearranged aggressive B-cell-lymphomas, resembling Burkitt lymphoma (BL), characteristically harboring a telomeric 11q-loss or combined 11q-proximal gains/loss-pattern has led to the introduction of the provisional entity of Burkitt-like lymphoma with 11q aberration (BLL-11q). Prompted by the discovery of a telomeric 11q-loss in an HIV-positive high-grade B-cell lymphoma patient, we investigated an extended cohort of aggressive B-cell-lymphomas, enriched for cases with histopathological features intermediate between DLBCL and BL including double- and triple-hit lymphomas (n = 47), for 11q-loss/combined 11q-proximal gains/loss-pattern by fluorescence-in-situ-hybridization. We provide first evidence that 11q-aberrations can be found in both BLL in the context of an underlying HIV-infection as well as in high-grade B-cell-lymphomas (HGBL) with MYC, BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements. We therefore propose, that the clinicopathological spectrum of malignancies carrying this aberration may be broader than previously assumed.