Recombination-independent recognition of DNA homology for meiotic silencing in Neurospora crassa

The pairing of homologous chromosomes represents a critical step of meiosis in nearly all sexually reproducing species. In many organisms, pairing involves chromosomes that remain apparently intact. The mechanistic nature of homology recognition at the basis of such pairing is unknown. Using “meiotic silencing by unpaired DNA” (MSUD) as a model process, we demonstrate the existence of a cardinally different approach to DNA homology recognition in meiosis. The main advantage of MSUD over other experimental systems lies in its ability to identify any relatively short DNA fragment lacking a homologous allelic partner. Here, we show that MSUD does not rely on the canonical mechanism of meiotic recombination, yet it is promoted by REC8, a conserved component of the meiotic cohesion complex. We also show that certain patterns of interspersed homology are recognized as pairable during MSUD. Such patterns need to be colinear and must contain short tracts of sequence identity spaced apart at 21 or 22 base pairs. By using these periodicity values as a guiding parameter in all-atom molecular modeling, we discover that homologous DNA molecules can pair by forming quadruplex-based contacts with an interval of 2.5 helical turns. This process requires right-handed plectonemic coiling and additional conformational changes in the intervening double-helical segments. Our results 1) reconcile genetic and biophysical evidence for the existence of direct homologous double-stranded DNA (dsDNA)–dsDNA pairing, 2) identify a role for this process in initiating RNA interference, and 3) suggest that chromosomes can be cross-matched by a precise mechanism that operates on intact dsDNA molecules.

Fossils, homology, and “Phylogenetic Paleo-ontogeny”: a reassessment of primary posterior plate homologies among fossil and living crinoids with insights from developmental biology

Paleobiologists must propose a priori hypotheses of homology when conducting a phylogenetic analysis of extinct taxa. The distributions of such “primary” homologies among species are fundamental to phylogeny reconstruction because they reflect a prior belief in what constitutes comparable organismal elements and are the principal determinants of the outcome of phylogenetic analysis. Problems arise when fossil morphology presents seemingly equivocal hypotheses of homology, herein referred to as antinomies. In groups where homology recognition has been elusive, such as echinoderms, these problems are commonly accompanied by the presence (and persistence) of poor descriptive terminology in taxonomic literature that confounds an understanding of characters and stymy phylogenetic research. This paper combines fossil morphology, phylogenetic systematics, and insights from evolutionary developmental biology to outline a research program in Phylogenetic Paleo-ontogeny. A “paleo” ontogenetic approach to character analysis provides a logical basis for homology recognition and discerning patterns of character evolution in a phylogenetic context. To illustrate the utility of the paleo-ontogenetic approach, I present a reassessment of historically contentious plate homologies for “pan-cladid” crinoids (Cladida, Flexibilia, Articulata). Developmental patterns in living crinoids were combined with the fossil record of pan-cladid morphologies to investigate primary posterior plate homologies. Results suggest the sequence of morphologic transitions unfolding during the ontogeny of extant crinoids are developmental relics of their Paleozoic precursors. Developmental genetic modules controlling posterior plate development in pan-cladid crinoids have likely experienced considerable constraint for over 250 million years and limited morphologic diversity in the complexity of calyx characters. Future phylogenetic analyses of pan-cladids are recommended to consider the presence of a single plate in the posterior region homologous with the radianal, rather than the anal X, as is commonly assumed.