Secondary Piggyback Intraocular Lens for Management of Residual Ametropia after Cataract Surgery

Purpose: To investigate the indications, clinical outcomes, and complications of secondary piggyback intraocular lens (IOL) implantation for correcting residual refractive error after cataract surgery. Methods: In this prospective interventional case series, patients who had residual refractive error after cataract surgery and were candidates for secondary piggyback IOL implantation between June 2015 and September 2018 were included. All eyes underwent secondary IOL implantation with the piggyback technique in the ciliary sulcus. The types of IOLs included Sulcoflex and three-piece foldable acrylic lenses. Patients were followed-up for at least one year. Results: Eleven patients were included. Seven patients had hyperopic ametropia, and four patients had residual myopia after cataract surgery. The preoperative mean of absolute residual refractive error was 7.20 ± 7.92, which reached 0.42 ± 1.26 postoperatively (P < 0.001). The postoperative spherical equivalent was within ±1 diopter of target refraction in all patients. The average preoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity was 1.13 ± 0.35 LogMAR, which significantly improved to 0.41 ± 0.24 LogMAR postoperatively (P = 0.008). There were no intraor postoperative complications during the 22.4 ± 9.5 months of follow-up. Conclusion: Secondary piggyback IOL implantation is an effective and safe technique for the correction of residual ametropia following cataract surgery. Three-piece IOLs can be safely placed as secondary piggyback IOLs in situations where specifically designed IOLs are not available.

Comparison between Refractive Outcome of Primary Piggyback Intraocular Lens versus Secondary Lens Iris Claw Lens in Posterior Microphthalmos

Purpose. To compare the refractive outcome of 2 different methods of intraocular lens implantation in cases of posterior microphthalmos, primary piggyback IOLs versus secondary iris claw lenses. Methods. This study was a retrospective interventional comparative study that included 60 eyes of 30 patients. The included patients had bilateral microphthalmos with high axial hyperopia and had undergone a lens-based surgical procedure for hyperopia correction. The included patients were equally divided into two groups. The first group had undergone refractive lens exchange (RLE) with primary piggyback IOL implantation. The second group undergone RLE with maximum available IOL power implanted followed by a secondary implantation of Artisan iris-fixated IOL (Ophtec B.V., Groningen, the Netherlands). Results. The 2 groups were highly comparable to each other regarding the mean age, axial length (AL), manifest refraction (MR), and K readings. Postoperatively, there was a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups regarding the manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups regarding the CDVA. At 36 months, 20% and 73% of the eyes were within ±0.5 D of intended refraction at 36 months in 1ry piggyback and 2ry Artisan groups, respectively. Fifty-three percent and 93% of the eyes were within ±1.0 D of intended refraction at 36 months in 1ry piggyback and 2ry Artisan groups, respectively (p=0.001). Conclusion. Secondary procedure with implantation of iris-fixated intraocular lens yielded very good results for treatment of axial hyperopia in cases of posterior microphthalmos. The primary piggyback IOL showed less satisfactory results with cases of under correction and the possible complication of interlenticular opacification. Both groups showed good safety parameters.

Comparison between refractive outcome of primary piggy back intraocular lens versus secondary lens iris claw lens in posterior microphthalmos

Purpose: to compare the refractive outcome of 2 different methods of intraocular lens implantation in cases of posterior microphthalmos, primary piggy back IOLs versus secondary iris claw lenses. Methods: This study was a retrospective interventional comparative study that included 60 eyes of 30 patients. The included patients had bilateral microphthalmos with high axial hyperopia and had undergone a lens based surgical procedure for hyperopia correction. The included patients were equally divided into two groups. The first group had undergone refractive lens exchange (RLE) with primary piggyback IOL implantation. The second group undergone RLE with maximum available IOL power implanted followed by a secondary implantation of Artisan iris-fixated IOL (Ophtec B.V., Groningen, The Netherlands). Results: The 2 groups were highly comparable to each other regarding the mean age, axial length (AL), manifest refraction (MR), and K readings. Postoperative, there was a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups regarding the manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups regarding the CDVA. At 36 months, 20 % and 73 % of eyes were within + 0.5 D of intended refraction at 36 months in 1ry piggy back and 2ry Artisan groups respectively. Fifty-three % and 93 % of eyes were within + 1.0 D of intended refraction at 36 months in 1ry piggy back and 2ry Artisan groups respectively (p = 0.001). Conclusion: secondary procedure with implantation of iris-fixated intraocular lens yielded very good results for treatment of axial hyperopia in cases of posterior microphthalmos. The primary piggyback IOL showed less satisfactory results with cases of under correction and the possible complication of inter-lenticular opacification. Both groups showed good safety parameters.

Sulcoflex Piggyback Intraocular Lens Implantation For Correction Of Refractive Errors Following Cataract Surgery

Purpose: To investigate the visual and refractive outcomes following implantation of a Sulcoflex intraocular lens (IOL) to correct pseudophakic refractive error. Methods: This retrospective chart review included 14 pseudophakic eyes of 13 patients who underwent implantation of a Sulcoflex IOL. The Sulcoflex IOL is a piggyback IOL technique where a secondary, supplementary lens is implanted in the ciliary sulcus. Results: Eleven eyes (78.6%) had a postoperative SE within 0.50 D of the targeted SE. Preoperative UDVA was 20/30 in 4 eyes (28.6%), and 20/40 or worse in 10 eyes (71.4%). Postoperative UDVA was 20/30 or better in all eyes, where half (50.0%) of eyes were 20/20 or better. The mean preoperative logMAR (0.50 ± 0.33) significantly improved to 0.06 ± 0.09, p<.01. There were no complications. Conclusions. The significant improvement in UDVA and the precision in reaching the target refraction suggest that the Sulcoflex is a viable and successful treatment option for pseudophakic refractive error.